Date: Thu, 21 Nov 1996 17:19:02 -0600 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Who needs Perl? We do! Message-ID: <l03010604aeba90dead5d@[204.69.236.50]> In-Reply-To: <199611212245.PAA12448@rocky.mt.sri.com> References: <l03010603aeba84fae19b@[204.69.236.50]> <199611212046.NAA13887@phaeton.artisoft.com> <199611211714.SAA01528@ravenock.cybercity.dk> <199611212141.OAA12035@rocky.mt.sri.com> <l03010603aeba84fae19b@[204.69.236.50]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Heck, show me a working prototype that has 4 levels. > > Top level > / \ > Subdir1 Subdir2 > / / \ > P1 P2 ssubdir3 > / \ > P3 P4 > >Proof that you're way is 'better' is all that we're asking for. I have offered "samples" before, but that offer was rejected. The demand was that I demonstrate by showing it work on EVERYTHING. (ie fete complete) If you are willing to accept a sanitized "demo" which shows how I would handle the "recursive" nature of the present system, I can do that without "fixing" any of the current code. A "sample" library and a tool or two are all that should be required. This is a far different request from the one that I prove that I can do EVERYTHING.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03010604aeba90dead5d>