Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:57:06 +0200 From: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Berkeley DB 4.1 Message-ID: <l0s6lr$6o0$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2MMHPBVIWPAAXKQXVESRS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I'd like to start a discussion on changing the default BDB port from 4.1 to something more recent. bdb version 4.1 was last released in 2002: README: Sleepycat Software: Berkeley DB 4.1.25: (December 19, 2002) There are some ports which have an unexpected dependacy on bdb via APR (apache22, subversion), which does is not wrong in itself, but is somewhat unelegant (as a personal opinion of course). I've found this previous discussion: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2013-February/081444.htm= l And while the argument seems valid, it also doesn't have an estimate of which / how many ports will break with a more recent bdb. Could an experimental port build be done with setting WITH_BDB_VER to either the most recent 4.x version (WITH_BDB_VER=3D48), to the last Sleepycat Licensed version (50) or the recent version in ports (60) to see what breaks? ------enig2MMHPBVIWPAAXKQXVESRS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlIxngMACgkQ/QjVBj3/HSwahgCePWT8E8Jy9S2FeNjpT6AtxvJa lDEAoILbebf0plrIX7AVq3/YNYO8Ewvi =lAxR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2MMHPBVIWPAAXKQXVESRS--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l0s6lr$6o0$1>