Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:46:07 +0200 From: Kenneth Vestergaard Schmidt <kvs@binarysolutions.dk> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf(4) status in 7.0-R Message-ID: <m17iqkxiv4.fsf@coruscant.pil.dk> In-Reply-To: <20070604052421.GM16563@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au> (Alex Wilkinson's message of "Mon\, 4 Jun 2007 13\:24\:22 %2B0800") References: <20070601103549.GA22490@localhost.localdomain> <m13b1b52aw.fsf@coruscant.pil.dk> <20070604052421.GM16563@obelix.dsto.defence.gov.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Wilkinson, Alex" <alex.wilkinson@dsto.defence.gov.au> writes: > >On that, note, it'd be nice with an update of carp(4), too, especially > >the 'carpdev'-functionality. I'd probably even be able to get some money > >to sponsor at least part of the work, if anybody was willing. > > What is the "'carpdev'-functionality" ? Quoting http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=110229937028512&w=2 : "Here's the long-promised diff which allows you to specify a physical interface 'carpdev' which the carp interface will bind to, and that interface does not have to have an IP address on the same subnet (or at all, in fact)." We want to use it to replace a FreeVRRPd-setup, since FreeVRRPd seems to be pretty unmaintained (and possibly patent-encumbered). /Kenneth
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m17iqkxiv4.fsf>