Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 19:41:27 +0900 From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> To: sthaug@nethelp.no Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Hi. /31 on ethernet links Message-ID: <m2fx8zzvzc.wl%randy@psg.com> In-Reply-To: <20091031.110837.41706473.sthaug@nethelp.no> References: <4AEB834D.1050907@keff.org> <20091031.090152.74670981.sthaug@nethelp.no> <m2iqdvzy1x.wl%randy@psg.com> <20091031.110837.41706473.sthaug@nethelp.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> However, I was simply reacting to the claim that it was *supported* by > Cisco. have you noticed a difference in the bug rate between things that are 'supported by cisco' and those that just happen to be there? :) but you're right. i liked. our p2ps are /30s, not /31s. and we're moving from /126 to /127. randy
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m2fx8zzvzc.wl%randy>