Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:00:23 +0100
From:      Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>
To:        Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com>
Cc:        Charles Swiger <cswiger@mac.com>
Subject:   Re: security/nmap & gcc3.3?
Message-ID:  <m33c9yq2h4.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org>
In-Reply-To: <40186515.9080001@fillmore-labs.com> (Oliver Eikemeier's message of "Thu, 29 Jan 2004 02:42:45 %2B0100")
References:  <1E5E3622-51D2-11D8-96D6-003065A20588@mac.com> <40186515.9080001@fillmore-labs.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> writes:

>> [ Other ports I've tried which use g++33 link fine; this problem seems
>> specific to security/nmap... ]
>
> I try to look into this over the weekend, or do you have a patch?

One notable difference between gcc 2.95 and 3.3 is that gcc 3.3 does
proper namespaces and all the standard stuff is now in the "std" name
space, while it was not split out into its own namespace in gcc 2.95.

Spraying some "using namespace std;" over the code may fix this. (No, I
haven't tested that.)

-- 
Matthias Andree

Encrypt your mail: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m33c9yq2h4.fsf>