Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 13:09:38 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de> To: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> Cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Subject: Re: Best way to override user's CFLAGS in a port? Message-ID: <m3d60ubcst.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <200409081809.04661.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> (Michael Nottebrock's message of "Wed, 8 Sep 2004 18:09:03 %2B0200") References: <XFMail.20040907114725.jdp@polstra.com> <m3k6v4rjjp.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> <200409081809.04661.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> writes: > If it's so well known that -O higher than 1 will not work, the > upstream source should be modified to that -O will be appended to any > CFLAGS, thus overriding any user-specified optimization setting. Indeed, Horio and you are right, hadn't thought of the obvious way :) -- Matthias Andree Encrypted mail welcome: my GnuPG key ID is 0x052E7D95 (PGP/MIME preferred)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3d60ubcst.fsf>