Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 15:02:16 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@gmx.de> To: Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Jean-Marc Lienher <jml@oksidizer.com> Subject: Re: Alternative compiler toolchain ? Message-ID: <m3veqhzdev.fsf@merlin.emma.line.org> In-Reply-To: <20060701032139.GB4915@dan.emsphone.com> (Dan Nelson's message of "Fri, 30 Jun 2006 22:21:39 -0500") References: <000f01c69ca5$02fa8ff0$6400a8c0@s2003> <20060701032139.GB4915@dan.emsphone.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dan Nelson <dnelson@allantgroup.com> writes: > In the last episode (Jul 01), Jean-Marc Lienher said: > >> I've found some other compilers on the web: >> http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/tcc/ (LGPL) > > tcc is very fast, probably has the most modern C parser of the lot, and > might even be able to build world except that the shared binaries it > generates aren't able to be loaded by our rtld. It looks like tcc only > emits the bare minimum to get Linux to run the executable, and I don't > know enough about the ELF format to fill in the blanks. I never managed to get tcc compiled stuff (GNU libc or dietlibc) to run under Linux, but haven't pursued the issue beyond that point. -- Matthias Andree
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m3veqhzdev.fsf>