Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 11:40:32 +1000 From: Greg Black <gjb@gbch.net> To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: soft updates and qmail (RE: qmail IO problems) Message-ID: <nospam-3a849c0ff3134a9@maxim.gbch.net> In-Reply-To: <200102092324.f19NODX15558@earth.backplane.com> of Fri, 09 Feb 2001 15:24:13 PST References: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0102061555550.1535-100000@duckman.distro.conectiva> <3A805035.C71AAD5E@monzoon.net> <200102061943.f16Jhp365113@earth.backplane.com> <3A805938.96ED890D@monzoon.net> <200102062018.f16KIdx66146@earth.backplane.com> <200102090602.f1962cM19819@earth.backplane.com> <3A84659C.F841F58E@monzoon.net> <200102092324.f19NODX15558@earth.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matt Dillon wrote: > Yes. In general softupdates will make the entire filesystem safer. Does it make sense to use softupdates on file systems like / and /usr which have little file creation/removal? Greg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?nospam-3a849c0ff3134a9>