Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:42:33 -0500 From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7@cox.net> To: "Marcin Wisnicki" <mwisnicki+freebsd@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with portupgrade && xscreensaver-gnome Message-ID: <op.ue4mo7ha9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <g6qoq7$pm4$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <20080730085123.81542622.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <g6ql7b$d5g$1@ger.gmane.org> <8543.59269510514$1217453541@news.gmane.org> <g6qoq7$pm4$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:09:11 -0500, Marcin Wisnicki <mwisnicki+freebsd@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 22:30:50 +0100, RW wrote: > >> I think Bill probably understands that. The issue, as I see it, is that >> the warning will just be a warning if you build manually, but if you >> build through portupgrade it causes it to fail. >> >> If the intent was to stop the build then IGNORE should have been set >> instead. > > Well the intent was to warn the user that without PAM, keyring > functionality will be disabled. You are right there needs to be some info > about that in KEYRING option description. > > If .warning breaks portupgrade I can change it to IGNORE. I prefer remove .warning and IGNORE. If user wants to enable keyring then the WITH_KEYRING should be always enable PAM, no matter if user has selected it disable. And, tweak comment in OPTIONS for (reqiure PAM). Cheers, Mezz -- mezz7@cox.net - mezz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD GNOME Team http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome@FreeBSD.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?op.ue4mo7ha9aq2h7>