Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 19:23:35 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net> To: Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: per-FIB socket binding Message-ID: <oqn0rr49-1snq-9o09-88p3-ssn063967509@yvfgf.mnoonqbm.arg> In-Reply-To: <4p5o59s4-5p70-0775-1479-990o1s5po7r2@yvfgf.mnoonqbm.arg> References: <Z2G_q5s35AremgYc@nuc> <4p5o59s4-5p70-0775-1479-990o1s5po7r2@yvfgf.mnoonqbm.arg>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 21 Dec 2024, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: >> Any thoughts/comments? > > That all said with your opt-in approach if the code itself doesn't bring > too many new complications I'd be happy with it (assuming FIBs still > have a use case). Seems there's plenty people using multi-FIB in various scenarios still, which is good to know. Go for it. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?oqn0rr49-1snq-9o09-88p3-ssn063967509>