Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 27 Jun 2001 21:24:55 +0200
From:      Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
To:        bsddiy@163.net
Cc:        Jordan Hubbard <jkh@osd.bsdi.com>, js43064n@pace.edu, chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re[2]: So what happens to FreeBSD now?
Message-ID:  <p05100337b75fdc404cc5@[194.78.241.123]>
In-Reply-To: <2425994267.20010627160101@163.net>
References:  <200106260901.AA23134284@stmail.pace.edu> <20010626084126W.jkh@osd.bsdi.com> <p0510031eb75e868cb1bd@[194.78.241.123]> <2425994267.20010627160101@163.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 4:01 PM +0800 6/27/01, David Xu wrote:

>  Too far to believe that MacOS X will have an X86 version. I don't want
>  to buy Apple's expensive Hardware. I prefer to use cheap X86 hardware
>  and has same or better performance and many choise.

	Mac hardware has become much less expensive in the last few 
years, and in my experience tends to be pretty price competitive for 
the same amount of performance (witness the fact that the closest 
competing laptop to the new iBook is almost $1000 more).

	Granted, there isn't as much choice as to configuration, and you 
don't tend to get as many slots (unless you want to buy an older 
clone, which can hopefully be upgraded with G3 and G4 
daughter-boards).


	But I really don't think that there will ever be an x86 version 
-- Apple has billions of dollars in the bank right now, and they're 
really hurting on the CPU chip side, with Motorola wanting to focus 
primarily or almost exclusively on the embedded market, and IBM 
wanting to focus on the server market.

	My best bet is that Apple will take some or all of this money and 
buy out Motorola's participating in the PowerPC chip consortium, or 
at least buy themselves the rights to design their own PowerPC chips 
and then have Motorola, IBM, or some other company actually handle 
the fabrication.


	Others have said that Apple should take the money and buy out 
Palm or Handspring, but I don't think that this is necessary.  I 
think that they can spruce up that partnership, invest some money in 
one or the other company, but allow them to continue as a separate 
entity.  Apple may not have a hand-held "digital appliance" right now 
as something to plug into their "digital hub", but then they also 
don't manufacture their own digital video or still cameras, either.

	No, this may be an area where Apple could help boost sales, and 
produce some really cool technology (a la Newton), but the CPU chip 
problem right now is a potential nuclear bomb on their horizon, and 
they really need to do whatever it takes to make sure that scenario 
simply cannot happen.


	But this is just my guess.

-- 
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>

/*        efdtt.c  Author:  Charles M. Hannum <root@ihack.net>          */
/*       Represented as 1045 digit prime number by Phil Carmody         */
/*     Prime as DNS cname chain by Roy Arends and Walter Belgers        */
/*                                                                      */
/*     Usage is:  cat title-key scrambled.vob | efdtt >clear.vob        */
/*   where title-key = "153 2 8 105 225" or other similar 5-byte key    */

dig decss.friet.org|perl -ne'if(/^x/){s/[x.]//g;print pack(H124,$_)}'

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p05100337b75fdc404cc5>