Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 21:30:44 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.org>, Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/libexec/atrun atrun.c Message-ID: <p0510100db7827da58818@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20010724090813.M55779@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <200107231205.f6NC5R526236@freefall.freebsd.org> <200107231103.f6NB3mi10592@freefall.freebsd.org> <200107231100.f6NB0Wm05549@freefall.freebsd.org> <20010724090813.M55779@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:08 AM +0930 7/24/01, Greg Lehey wrote: >On Monday, 23 July 2001 at 5:05:27 -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> kris 2001/07/23 05:05:27 PDT >> Log: >> s/adress/address/ > >Do we really need this detail in the log message? That's what >diffs are for. If you are questioning the log message, then the issue is "What are log messages for?". The log message is supposed to give a short but informative summary of what the change is. These log messages are informative, and it's hard to imagine how they could be any shorter. Sounds like a good log message to me. I would not want a separate commit for each word that is changed in a single file, but if there is only one word which needs to be changed at a given point in time, then what else would you expect in the log message for that commit? -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0510100db7827da58818>