Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2001 13:14:58 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: obrien@FreeBSD.org, Peter Wemm <peter@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: macro recommendation (Was ...) Message-ID: <p0510100db7bc0a81c3f1@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <20010905085206.B95963@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200109041705.f84H5W692572@earth.backplane.com> <20010904122843.A56085@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010904233320.A34429@nagual.pp.ru> <20010904123718.A56317@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010904234757.A34576@nagual.pp.ru> <20010904125125.A56758@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010904140449.B75606@dragon.nuxi.com> <200109042122.f84LMcm95136@earth.backplane.com> <20010904145320.A76317@dragon.nuxi.com> <200109042205.f84M5YM95627@earth.backplane.com> <20010905085206.B95963@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 8:52 AM -0700 9/5/01, David O'Brien wrote: >Also, if you want a truely portable usage, we cannot use __RCSID() >because too much NetBSD and vendor sources use it. Peter's hack >will not work for all compilers. I would have prefered a __FBSD() >and __CSRG() macro for the same reasons we switched to $FreeBSD$ >from $Id$. These would have worked for all compilers, but I cannot >complete with an effort backed by Peter. It seems reasonable to me that freebsd would use different macro names for freebsd-specific id's. The issue isn't one that I feel strongly about, but I can see the advantage of using distinctive names. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0510100db7bc0a81c3f1>