Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2002 02:20:10 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com>, "David O'Brien" <dev-null@NUXI.com> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: -current results (was something funny with soft updates?) Message-ID: <p0511171bb948476deea0@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <200207030601.g6361E5E010289@apollo.backplane.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0206281233500.75410-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <200207020314.g623Eke5038019@apollo.backplane.com> <20020702164756.E70767@dragon.nuxi.com> <200207030106.g6316Rwp008905@apollo.backplane.com> <20020702182303.A94386@dragon.nuxi.com> <200207030601.g6361E5E010289@apollo.backplane.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:01 PM -0700 7/2/02, Matthew Dillon wrote: > I get just about the same performance for GCC2 as I > do for GCC3 in the tests I've run so far. It makes > me wonder what the hell GCC3 is burning all that > cpu *on*. One of the guys here at RPI (dec, actually) claims he got buildworld under current to run at more reasonable speeds by explicitly setting the CPUTYPE. I haven't had the time to run any experiments with that yet. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0511171bb948476deea0>