Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:05:20 +0100 From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: FreeBSD current users <current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: SF Bay area hackfest Message-ID: <p0600202dbc87a7e902f6@[10.0.1.2]> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403241221540.63489-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0403241221540.63489-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:22 PM -0800 2004/03/24, Julian Elischer wrote:
> who cares?
>
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2004, David O'Brien wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2004 at 09:01:11PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>> > Let's get basic functionality woring on x86 and amd64 before we start
>> > diverging into optimization strategies.
>>
>> Uh, what about basic functionalty on Sparc64 and Alpha?
Well, it depends. Would things be broken for SPARC64, or would
it just not have TLS (which could presumably be added later)?
If things would be broken for SPARC64, then I would be very
disappointed to be unable to get my Ultra 10 clones up and working in
the near future.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
GCS/IT d+(-) s:+(++)>: a C++(+++)$ UMBSHI++++$ P+>++ L+ !E-(---) W+++(--) N+
!w--- O- M++ V PS++(+++) PE- Y+(++) PGP>+++ t+(+++) 5++(+++) X++(+++) R+(+++)
tv+(+++) b+(++++) DI+(++++) D+(++) G+(++++) e++>++++ h--- r---(+++)* z(+++)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0600202dbc87a7e902f6>