Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 16:52:24 +0200 From: Brad Knowles <brad.knowles@skynet.be> To: Eirik Oeverby <ltning@anduin.net> Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren?= Schmidt <sos@DeepCore.dk> Subject: Re: Multiple choices for RAID-0, best performance? Message-ID: <p06002085bd009afafa68@[10.0.1.3]> In-Reply-To: <40DAE792.1090701@anduin.net> References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8M jT1PdsKAAAAQAAAArboJgGwHU0apkIeCcojdKwEAAAAA@telia.com><40DADE69.3 0702@Deep Core.dk> <40DAE792.1090701@anduin.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 4:39 PM +0200 2004-06-24, Eirik Oeverby wrote:
> Any chance Silicon Image SATA-RAID chipsets will be supported this way?
> Some of the heftier Tyan (dual) Opteron boards use this chipset.. I hear
> from various sources that it sucks, but ...
Check the archives for previous comments from Søren on this chipset.
> Can't give up hope yet, can
> I? ;)
Yes, you might. See the archives.
--
Brad Knowles, <brad.knowles@skynet.be>
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania.
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/>; for more info.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p06002085bd009afafa68>