Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2004 17:42:08 -0500 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: openafs-devel@openafs.org Subject: Re: [OpenAFS-devel] OpenAFS for FreeBSD 5.2 patch Message-ID: <p0602040cbc7be15e093a@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <200403100524.i2A5OM9M002988@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <20040310022555.7097420EEB@citi.umich.edu> <p060204f1bc742f41469f@[128.113.24.47]> <200403100308.i2A38PYS002421@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <p060204f2bc744cd635b0@[128.113.24.47]> <p060204f3bc7452928db0@[128.113.24.47]> <200403100524.i2A5OM9M002988@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 12:24 AM -0500 3/10/04, Garrett Wollman wrote: ><<On Wed, 10 Mar 2004, Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> said: > >> and it seems to be working correctly. I can 'klog' to my RPI >> userid, and then poke around all my private files in AFS @rpi. >> I was also able to 'umount' /afs correctly. It's encouraging >> to see it get this far! Thanks for the extra tips. > >Once you get enough activity to start to recycle vnodes (and AFS >vcache entries) it will probably fall over pretty fast. Adding >WITNESS and DEBUG_VFS_LOCKS may make the bugs more obvious. I'm building a second machine for stress-testing this (my main maachine has too much important data on it). I also have a freebsd-sparc64 machine. Should I give this openafs a try on that, or should I just stick with the i386 platform? -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0602040cbc7be15e093a>