Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 20:52:38 -0400 From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> To: Rob B <rbyrnes@mailshack.com>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsdb and ruby bug on 4-STABLE Message-ID: <p0611040abd655933447c@[128.113.24.47]> In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20040909092123.023f79f0@mail.nerdshack.com> References: <20040906143153.N44103@atlantis.atlantis.dp.ua> <20040906125305.7f577034@vixen42.24-119-122-191.cpe.cableone.net> <413CA557.5090205@makeworld.com> <200409070649.11417.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> <413E4849.7060200@kutulu.org> <6.1.2.0.2.20040909092123.023f79f0@mail.nerdshack.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 9:22 AM +1000 9/9/04, Rob B wrote: >>This way, all of the package tools will always see the replacement >>driver, regardless of the state of the environment when you run >>them :) > >For the record - Alpha arch does not exhibit this problem. This >is on both 5.3-BETA and 4.10-STABLE It is almost certainly a matter of luck. With some INDEX's, i386 will see the problem and alpha won't. On other INDEX's, you'll be the one having trouble and no one on i386 will see the problem. It's not like the bugs magically disappear on alpha. They just show up in different situations. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?p0611040abd655933447c>