Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 15:42:20 +0000 (UTC) From: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru> To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: being loud (Was: FreeBSD problems and preliminary ways to solve) Message-ID: <slrnj5crar.2er.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net> References: <slrnj4oiiq.21rg.vadim_nuclight@kernblitz.nuclight.avtf.net> <CADW03ip6qUAezB70cOjLG5go25R2mduQEvG5-W=8Z9nO17FN7A@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-Vmon1%2Bzn2Kghqm6MnJdKZ64H5BM%2BXTiaVaPrt6x5eLJgepQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGH67wTVbQKbY=TMxspCmnusvXB%2BR_qA3C0Y0=wU6dtKgVM1Lg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Garrett Cooper! On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 23:54:35 -0700; Garrett Cooper wrote about 'Re: FreeBSD problems and preliminary ways to solve': >> And that's been my experience too. >> >> Linux users and advocates are very .. loud. FreeBSD users and >> advocates tend not to be so loud. >> Maybe that needs to change. > I also personally think that companies that use FreeBSD need to be > louder as well. There is Isilon, iXsystems, Juniper, etc, but there > are other companies that don't take a more active role in > acknowledging that they run FreeBSD under the hood which only > detriments FreeBSD's overall mindshare. > It's funny how certain companies like Dell, IBM, etc choose to be > so loud about their active Linux support -- so why should more > companies using FreeBSD also not take suit? So, you think. You think right. I agree, many others will agree. But what then? That's just words in arch@ - a little place for developers. Not much heared outside. Words, not actions. So, who will go and tell to that companies they should be loud?.. -- WBR, Vadim Goncharov. ICQ#166852181 mailto:vadim_nuclight@mail.ru [Anti-Greenpeace][Sober FreeBSD zealot][http://nuclight.livejournal.com]
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?slrnj5crar.2er.vadim_nuclight>