Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2020 13:11:24 +0000 From: Robert Crowston <crowston@protonmail.com> To: Klaus Cucinauomo <maciphone2@googlemail.com> Cc: Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>, Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org>, "gonzo@freebsd.org" <gonzo@FreeBSD.org>, "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] vs. to 0x1f0000 (size 0xbd90) [works]? Message-ID: <tN5C4jzmxPmrt22GDxOfVidCT4I48oCyxVjfwxOdPAZpkQC1qBbhegOnnbkamnvGD-x81AxG5CorI1NIzfLf-91zcgOmQR0WtLrJ83PJJtI=@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3E9D015B-5702-4A52-9366-49E20BDDA5F4@googlemail.com> References: <2B1B21CB-1A63-42CE-8917-98870C88CACE@yahoo.com> <F8DBF042-FD57-4AE3-8F98-0E36945469A9@yahoo.com> <3E9D015B-5702-4A52-9366-49E20BDDA5F4@googlemail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> That=E2=80=99s the problem, armstub8-gic should have been removed when us= ing modern firmware because it no longer depends on it. So are you telling me that I could rip out all the startup logic from the a= rmstub and just leave our CPU spin up logic? =E2=80=94 RHC.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?tN5C4jzmxPmrt22GDxOfVidCT4I48oCyxVjfwxOdPAZpkQC1qBbhegOnnbkamnvGD-x81AxG5CorI1NIzfLf-91zcgOmQR0WtLrJ83PJJtI=>