Date: 08 Sep 2000 22:59:03 -0700 From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>, Neil Blakey-Milner <nbm@mithrandr.moria.org>, FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Ports Options Paper Message-ID: <vqcg0na6r88.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Kris Kennaway's message of "Fri, 8 Sep 2000 20:50:23 -0700 (PDT)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009082044380.98451-100000@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> * I suggest the way forward in this direction would be to actually implement * patches and look for any unexepcted problems. * * But let's try and keep the number of concurrent projects to a minimum * since it's only a few of us involved, and probably fewer still who are * going to be writing patches - we have the improved versioning system about * to go in, it's probably most productive now to actually go and implement * one of the remaining ones, instead of talking about them all at once and * getting nowhere. * * I suggest porting NetBSD's wildcard dependency and conflict stuff next. * Thats the next step towards an upgrade system. That sounds like a good way to go. Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcg0na6r88.fsf>