Date: 25 Apr 2000 02:34:55 -0700 From: asami@FreeBSD.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami) To: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <ports@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Obsolete categories? Message-ID: <vqcln22mslc.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: Will Andrews's message of "Tue, 25 Apr 2000 00:59:46 -0400" References: <20000425005946.E445@argon.blackdawn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Will Andrews <andrews@technologist.com> * I was just looking over the list of categories in the handbook's * porting.html, and thought the following seemed rather obsolete (or don't * really deserve to be a category): * * elisp * plan9 * offix Why do you think so? They are all still used and are used to identify a collection of ports, which is exactly what a category is supposed to do. * Also, has anyone checked to see whether we still need those older tcl/tk * virtual categories? "grep <category> INDEX" is your friend. :) Satoshi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?vqcln22mslc.fsf>