Date: 07 May 2001 19:24:39 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries Message-ID: <xzp66fdm5rc.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <99353.989256023@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> References: <99353.989256023@axl.fw.uunet.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za> writes: > On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an > > option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't > > print a message when it omits printing an opaque variable. > Do you think it'd be okay to allow an argument to -a and -A that > specifies the sysctl node from which to descend? Have you tried e.g. 'sysctl hw' lately? DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzp66fdm5rc.fsf>