Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:00:54 +0100 From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly? Message-ID: <xzpeku4t0bt.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <4003F684.6090907@centtech.com> (Eric Anderson's message of "Tue, 13 Jan 2004 07:45:40 -0600") References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net> <1073998390.18384.19.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> <20040114001137.5ce8983b@piglet.goo> <1074000332.18384.43.camel@kaiser.sig11.org> <20040114003443.260c6738@piglet.goo> <4003F684.6090907@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> writes: > It would be much more efficient if even *some* of the developers that > are working on "new-and-cool" features would at least mention it on > the -CURRENT list, or even send an email to the person (people?) > working on the report. [...] > Josef already agreed to do the markup (the most tedious part of the > work) - so now it's just information gathering.. You must have missed the part of this thread where I said "we tried that before, and it didn't work". DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpeku4t0bt.fsf>