Date: 02 Jun 2002 16:00:50 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org>, <audit@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: %j for printf(9) Message-ID: <xzpelfp6ar1.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: <20020601232049.E2458-100000@gamplex.bde.org> References: <20020601232049.E2458-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> writes: > It came out 1 line shorter with less duplication for me. Here is a patch > relative to the version in your next mail. I didn't rename fetch* to > handle*, and I may have broken something moved the initializations of > `sign' around too much. I reordered some initializations (especially for > %p) so that the order is almost (?) always (base, ..., sign, num). Applied, and renamed fetch_* to handle_*. I'll test it a bit before committing. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpelfp6ar1.fsf>