Date: 29 Jan 2001 11:49:36 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: Vadim Belman <voland@lflat.org> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, "Louis A. Mamakos" <louie@TransSys.COM> Subject: Re: /etc/shells #include syntax support patch Message-ID: <xzpg0i2ljjz.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Vadim Belman's message of "Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:59:30 %2B0100" References: <20010128101349.2c94539f.steveo@eircom.net> <20010128190227.B25222@spawn.nectar.com> <200101290453.f0T4roq13148@whizzo.transsys.com> <20010129105930.C62046@lflat.vas.mobilix.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Vadim Belman <voland@lflat.org> writes: > On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 11:53:50PM -0500, Louis A. Mamakos wrote: > > It doesn't seem unreasonable to have a single file with a list of allowable > > shells. > It does if you think of mergemaster, for example. With any upgrade > it consider /etc/shells as changed and prompts for replacing/merging/etc. No. Mergemaster doesn't care about the contents of the file, only about its $FreeBSD$ tag. As long as this stays the same, it'll leave the file alone. If you remove the $FreeBSD$ tag in the installed file or someone commits to src/etc/shells, mergemaster will prompt you. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpg0i2ljjz.fsf>