Date: 28 Mar 2000 14:38:38 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: chris@calldei.com, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal: Union mount of fdesc on top of /dev Message-ID: <xzpg0tbxoa9.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Poul-Henning Kamp's message of "Tue, 28 Mar 2000 14:31:20 %2B0200" References: <1394.954246680@critter.freebsd.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> writes: > In message <xzpsnxbxor2.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > > Anyway, since /dev/std* never change, how about having fdesc *only* > > handle the /dev/fd/* stuff, so you can (non-union) mount it on /dev/fd > > and let /dev/std* be either symlinks to /dev/fd/[012] or plain old > > static device nodes like they're now? > Symlinks have my vote. The downside is they'll be broken if fdesc isn't mounted... DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpg0tbxoa9.fsf>