Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      23 Jul 2002 09:30:11 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@queasyweasel.com>
Cc:        Andrew Reilly <areilly@bigpond.net.au>, Mark Valentine <mark@thuvia.demon.co.uk>, jos@catnook.com, freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Package system flaws?
Message-ID:  <xzpit36oq9o.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <71AEEE0E-9DD3-11D6-A01D-000393038CC8@queasyweasel.com>
References:  <71AEEE0E-9DD3-11D6-A01D-000393038CC8@queasyweasel.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@queasyweasel.com> writes:
> In the world of packaging, all of the post-configuration and custom
> installation stuff is essentially controlled by scripts already,
> they're just shell scripts and sh(1) is already notorious for its weak
> variable handling (no associative arrays), cumbersome conditional
> statements, rudimentary string handling primitives, and so on.

So let's import a ksh.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpit36oq9o.fsf>