Date: 08 Dec 1997 21:37:01 +0100 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan Smørgrav) To: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: isa.c Message-ID: <xzpiusztvv6.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Nate Williams's message of Mon, 8 Dec 1997 12:51:23 -0700 References: <xzpzpmblopf.fsf@gjallarhorn.ifi.uio.no> <199712081829.LAA12105@mt.sri.com> <xzpsos3lj3o.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> <199712081942.MAA12478@mt.sri.com> <xzpsos31uqz.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> <199712081951.MAA12645@mt.sri.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> writes: > > > You'd be much better off upgrading to 2.2.5R, as I suspect his patches > > > apply to that pretty cleanly. > > I have a list of good reasons for not upgrading to 2.2.2R, and a > > longer one for not upgrading to 2.2.5R. > And those would be? Amongst other items, lack of a suitable backup device, and reports of degraded performance in 2.2.5R. -- * Finrod (INTJ) * Unix weenie * dag-erli@ifi.uio.no * cellular +47-92835919 * RFC1123: "Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send" # unzip ; strip ; touch ; finger ; mount ; fsck ; more ; yes ; umount ; sleep
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpiusztvv6.fsf>