Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:12:52 +0200 From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Third "RFC" on on pkg-data ideas for ports Message-ID: <xzpk6z2vxa3.fsf@dwp.des.no> In-Reply-To: <p0602040dbcd716257540@[128.113.24.47]> (Garance A. Drosihn's message of "Mon, 24 May 2004 00:07:34 -0400") References: <p0602040dbcd716257540@[128.113.24.47]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu> writes: > The third proposal is basically: > [rewrite the ports system from scratch] > So, should we pursue any of this? You can't possibly seriously believe that the project will adopt this model without first seeing proof that it works and has significant advantages (and no significant disadvantages) over the existing model. This (reengineering the ports tree) has been tried before, BTW. It didn't fly, and the project (openpackages.org) is now dead. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpk6z2vxa3.fsf>