Date: 14 May 1998 11:33:00 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: Studded <Studded@dal.net>, Dennis Reiter <mcneills@inw.net>, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UNIX 96 (was: Internet Exploder inseparable from Windows?) Message-ID: <xzplns5dwoj.fsf@hrotti.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Greg Lehey's message of "Thu, 14 May 1998 08:37:24 %2B0930" References: <000c01bd7e99$05a4bba0$0200a8c0@Dell> <355A0F1A.30F33317@dal.net> <19980514083724.E3535@freebie.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> writes: > It's been that way for a long time. UNIX 95%. Trick question: which > of these operating systems may *not* be called UNIX 95%? > > FreeBSD > IBM OS/390 (formerly MVS) > Microsoft Windows NT > System V > > Hint: only one of them may not. What's to stop us from making FreeBSD conform to the standard and gain the right to use the UNIX name? -- Noone else has a .sig like this one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzplns5dwoj.fsf>