Date: 01 Sep 1998 01:07:26 +0200 From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: Matthew Hunt <mph@pobox.com>, "Matthew D. Fuller" <fullermd@futuresouth.com>, committers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make.conf Message-ID: <xzpr9xwpx75.fsf@grjottunagard.ifi.uio.no> In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Sun, 30 Aug 1998 08:57:46 -0700" References: <1018.904492666@time.cdrom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> writes: > If /etc/make.conf is split at all then it should be split into: > > /usr/src/conf.mk - configuration frobs exclusively for /usr/src > > /usr/ports/conf.mk - configuration frobs exclusively for /usr/ports. > > /usr/share/mk/conf.mk - stuff truly global to any invocation of Bmake > e.g. variables you want both src and ports > (and so on) to get as a base set before > potentially laying their own on top. No. If I don't have a full source tree installed, but check out part of the tree (say, 'cvs co ls') from my local copy of the repository, I won't be able to compile it. If you have to put them i separate directories, I'd suggest /etc/make/ ostl. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - dag-erli@ifi.uio.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpr9xwpx75.fsf>