Date: 21 Dec 2000 12:32:52 +0100 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> To: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Supporting VirtualPC... Message-ID: <xzpu27yf1qz.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: seebs@plethora.net's message of "Wed, 20 Dec 2000 23:48:10 -0600" References: <200012210548.XAA23830@guild.plethora.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) writes: > I am wondering what would be considered a "good" way to encode the knowledge > that machines with "ConnectixCPU" in the mode string need specific special > treatment in two widely disparate places. Assuming the ident code correctly sets cpu_vendor to "ConnectixCPU" (rather than e.g. "GenuineIntel" or "AuthenticAMD") you can just check against that. It's declared in <machine/md_var.h>. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpu27yf1qz.fsf>