Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      18 Jun 2001 20:34:15 +0200
From:      Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
To:        Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc:        audit@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/rarpd Makefile rarpd.8 rarpd.c
Message-ID:  <xzpzob57i3c.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <20010618092759.C9834@xor.obsecurity.org>
References:  <200106180648.f5I6mXw73601@freefall.freebsd.org> <74656.992853414@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> <20010618092759.C9834@xor.obsecurity.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
> -audit has turned into the defacto code review mailing list, though it
> was originalliy intended only for security audits.  Is it really
> necessary to send patches to two mailing lists?

How about setting up a -review list for general code review, and
trying to keep -audit more or less focused on reviews and audits of
security-sensitive code?

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-audit" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzpzob57i3c.fsf>