2019/freebsd-ppc/20190505.freebsd-ppc
Messages: 93, sorted by subject
|
Last page update: Sat Jan 3 13:12:12 UTC 2026
|
|
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
1. May 3 Mark Millard Re: 970MP PowerMac G5s: What printf's show about cpu_mp_unleash hangups on the test variant of head -r347003 (found cpu_mp_unleash counterexam 2. May 3 Mark Millard Re: 970MP PowerMac G5s: What printf's show about cpu_mp_unleash hangups on the test variant of head -r347003 (found cpu_mp_unleash counterexam 3. May 3 Mark Millard 970MP PowerMac G5s: What printf's show about cpu_mp_unleash hangups on the test variant of head -r347003 (surprising, important) 4. May 3 Mark Millard 970MP PowerMac G5s: What some basic printf's show about vt_upgrade and fhanew_init hang-ups 5. Apr 28 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder 6. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder 7. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder 8. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder 9. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder 10. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder 11. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 233863] Various PowerMac G5 models may require kern.smp.disabled=1 and must set usefdt=1 which causes net interface reorder 12. Apr 28 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 13. Apr 28 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 14. Apr 28 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 15. Apr 28 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 16. Apr 28 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 17. Apr 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 18. Apr 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 19. Apr 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 20. Apr 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad
21. Apr 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 22. Apr 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 23. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 24. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 25. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 26. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 27. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 28. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235060] [boot] FreeBSD 12.0 Release DVD and CD will not boot on PowerMac G5 Quad 29. Apr 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 30. Apr 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 31. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 32. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 33. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 34. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 35. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 36. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 37. May 1 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 38. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 39. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 40. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
41. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 42. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 43. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 44. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 45. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 46. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 47. May 2 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 48. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 49. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 50. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 51. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 52. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 53. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 54. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 55. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 56. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 57. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 58. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 59. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 60. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64
61. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 62. May 3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237208] java/openjdk11: port to powerpc64 63. Apr 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237370] java/openjdk12: Add powerpc64 support 64. Apr 29 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 237370] java/openjdk12: Add powerpc64 support 65. Apr 28 Dennis Clarke bugid reports are not a mail list 66. Apr 28 Tom Pusateri Re: bugid reports are not a mail list 67. Apr 28 Dennis Clarke Re: bugid reports are not a mail list 68. Apr 28 Tom Pusateri Re: bugid reports are not a mail list 69. Apr 30 Mark Millard Do non-PowerMac G5 powerpc64's ever get any slb faults in cpudep_ap_bootstrap? 70. Apr 29 Alexey Kardashevskiy Re: Fail to boot FreeBSD12 or 13 on POWER9 under PowerKVM 71. Apr 29 Dennis Clarke from bugid 235060 FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-powerpc-powerpc64-disc1.iso install test 72. Apr 29 Francis Little Re: from bugid 235060 FreeBSD-12.0-RELEASE-powerpc-powerpc64-disc1.iso install test 73. May 1 Mark Millard How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap 74. May 1 Mark Millard Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap 75. May 1 Justin Hibbits Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap 76. May 1 Mark Millard Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap 77. May 1 Justin Hibbits Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap 78. May 1 Mark Millard Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap 79. May 1 Justin Hibbits Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap 80. May 2 Mark Millard Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap
81. May 2 Mark Millard Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap 82. May 2 Mark Millard Re: How many segments does it take to span from VM_MIN_KERNEL_ADDRESS through VM_MAX_SAFE_KERNEL_ADDRESS? 128 in moea64_late_bootstrap 83. May 2 Mark Millard kernel mode EXC_DSE handling depends on td->td_pcb-> not slb faulting in setting up its slbmte use? 84. May 3 Mark Millard Re: kernel mode EXC_DSE handling depends on td->td_pcb-> not slb faulting in setting up its slbmte use? 85. May 1 Mark Millard moea64_cpu_bootstrap_native slbmte (and such) use: missing context synchronizations (isync's)? 86. May 1 Mark Millard Re: moea64_cpu_bootstrap_native slbmte (and such) use: missing context synchronizations (isync's)? 87. May 1 Mark Millard n_slbs==32 vs. restore_kernsrs use of slbmte in its loop 88. May 2 Mark Millard slbmte, slbie, slbia isync paranoyia for -r347003 investigation: does it change any behavior as stands? (yes) 89. May 4 Mark Millard The first 2 handle_kernel_slb_spill calls on the 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 example context: as expected? (short) 90. May 4 Mark Millard Re: The first 2 handle_kernel_slb_spill calls on the 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 example context: as expected? (short) 91. May 4 Mark Millard Re: The first 2 handle_kernel_slb_spill calls on the 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 example context: as expected? (short) 92. May 4 Mark Millard Re: The first 2 handle_kernel_slb_spill calls on the 2-socket/2-cores-each G5 example context: as expected? (short) 93. May 1 Mark Millard Tiny summary of todays explorations: __pcpu[] has no reserved kernel slb entry(s) to cover it; slbmte and the like missing some isync use
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date