2010/freebsd-stable/20100314.freebsd-stable
Messages: 171, sorted by subject
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:24:29 UTC 2023
|
|
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Mar 12 Pierre Beyssac (fixed) Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 2. Mar 12 Jeremy Chadwick Re: (fixed) Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 3. Mar 12 Pierre Beyssac Re: (fixed) Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 4. Mar 12 Alexander Motin Re: (fixed) Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 5. Mar 12 Pierre Beyssac Re: (fixed) Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 6. Mar 12 Alexander Motin Re: (fixed) Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 7. Mar 12 Jeremy Chadwick Re: (fixed) Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 8. Mar 12 Pierre Beyssac 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 9. Mar 12 Jeremy Chadwick Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 10. Mar 12 Pyun YongHyeon Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 11. Mar 12 Pierre Beyssac Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 12. Mar 12 Pyun YongHyeon Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 13. Mar 12 Pierre Beyssac Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 14. Mar 12 Pyun YongHyeon Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 15. Mar 12 Pyun YongHyeon Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 16. Mar 13 Pierre Beyssac Re: 8-STABLE interrupt storm on atapci(?), Dell Inspiron 580 17. Mar 8 Brian Conway 8.0-RELEASE-p2: boot0cfg yields "vnode_pager_getpages: I/O read error" 18. Mar 8 Maciej Milewski Re: 8.0-RELEASE-p2: boot0cfg yields "vnode_pager_getpages: I/O read error" 19. Mar 8 Brian Conway Re: 8.0-RELEASE-p2: boot0cfg yields "vnode_pager_getpages: I/O read error" 20. Mar 8 Eugene Grosbein Re: 8.0-RELEASE-p2: boot0cfg yields "vnode_pager_getpages: I/O read error"
21. Mar 11 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 22. Mar 11 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 23. Mar 10 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on arm/arm 24. Mar 10 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/i386 25. Mar 10 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8 tinderbox] failure on i386/pc98 26. Mar 13 FreeBSD Tinderbox [releng_8_0 tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 27. Mar 8 Nenhum_de_Nos ahci errors on 8-stable 28. Mar 8 Jeremy Chadwick Re: ahci errors on 8-stable 29. Mar 8 Nenhum_de_Nos Re: ahci errors on 8-stable 30. Mar 13 Harald Schmalzbauer Re: ahcich timeouts, only with ahci, not with ataahci 31. Mar 13 Svein Skogen (Listmail Acc Re: Amanda, FreeBSD8, amtype, hairpulling, etc. 32. Mar 13 Diego F. Arias R. Re: Amanda, FreeBSD8, amtype, hairpulling, etc. 33. Mar 13 Weongyo Jeong Re: Broadcom USB wireless support? 34. Mar 9 Kevin Oberman Re: Cron output mail lost with update to RELENG_7 35. Mar 10 Kevin Oberman Re: Cron output mail lost with update to RELENG_7 36. Mar 7 Thomas Hurst Re: em(4) interface hangs under 8.0-RELEASE 37. Mar 7 Jeremy Chadwick Re: em(4) interface hangs under 8.0-RELEASE 38. Mar 7 Max Laier Re: em(4) interface hangs under 8.0-RELEASE 39. Mar 8 Thomas Hurst Re: em(4) interface hangs under 8.0-RELEASE 40. Mar 8 Howard Leadmon FBSD 8.0 & ZFS Issue.. default_perms_for_dir
41. Mar 10 FreeBSD Security Officer FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE EoL delayed to end of June 2010 42. Mar 9 Sergey Radashevskiy freebsd 7.2stable em0: discard frame w/o packet header 43. Mar 10 Paulo Fragoso Re: freebsd 8.0 stable amd64/x86 needs ~9min to bootup 44. Mar 7 Sam Leffler Re: FreeBSD-8.0 802.11n support with ath/mwl 45. Mar 7 Jim Pingle Re: FreeBSD-8.0 802.11n support with ath/mwl 46. Mar 9 Giulio Ferro Fwd: Re: NFS Client error 47. Mar 9 Daniel Braniss Re: Fwd: Re: NFS Client error 48. Mar 9 Giulio Ferro Re: Fwd: Re: NFS Client error 49. Mar 12 Miroslav Lachman Geom not found: "gm0" / Failed to write sector zero 50. Mar 12 Steve Bertrand I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 51. Mar 12 Xin LI Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 52. Mar 12 Steve Bertrand Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 53. Mar 12 Xin LI Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 54. Mar 12 Steve Bertrand Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 55. Mar 12 Steve Bertrand Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 56. Mar 12 Steve Bertrand Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 57. Mar 12 Xin LI Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 58. Mar 12 Steve Bertrand Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 59. Mar 12 Xin LI Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 60. Mar 12 Garrett Cooper Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade
61. Mar 12 Steve Bertrand Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 62. Mar 12 Xin LI Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 63. Mar 12 Steve Bertrand Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 64. Mar 12 Steve Bertrand Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 65. Mar 12 Garrett Cooper Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 66. Mar 12 Greg Byshenk Re: I broke my SSH to jails after 7.2-8.0 src upgrade 67. Mar 8 John Baldwin Re: is dtrace usable? 68. Mar 9 Alexander Leidinger Re: is dtrace usable? 69. Mar 9 John Baldwin Re: is dtrace usable? 70. Mar 9 Alexander Leidinger Re: is dtrace usable? 71. Mar 9 Robert N. M. Watson Re: is dtrace usable? 72. Mar 10 Alexander Leidinger Re: is dtrace usable? 73. Mar 10 John Baldwin Re: is dtrace usable? 74. Mar 10 Alexander Leidinger Re: is dtrace usable? 75. Mar 12 Steve Bertrand Jails & 8.0 76. Mar 12 Andrew Hotlab RE: Jails & 8.0 77. Mar 11 Kenneth Hatteland make installworld problem 78. Mar 12 Steve Bertrand Re: make installworld problem 79. Mar 9 Stefan Bethke Many processes stuck in zfs 80. Mar 9 Peter Jeremy Re: Many processes stuck in zfs
81. Mar 9 =?UTF-8?B?RnLDqWTDqXJpYw== Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 82. Mar 9 Stefan Bethke Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 83. Mar 9 Pawel Jakub Dawidek Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 84. Mar 9 Stefan Bethke Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 85. Mar 9 Borja Marcos Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 86. Mar 9 Pawel Jakub Dawidek Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 87. Mar 9 Borja Marcos Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 88. Mar 10 Kevin Oberman Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 89. Mar 10 Kevin Oberman Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 90. Mar 10 Borja Marcos Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 91. Mar 10 Pawel Jakub Dawidek Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 92. Mar 10 Ollivier Robert Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 93. Mar 10 Stefan Bethke Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 94. Mar 10 Borja Marcos Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 95. Mar 10 Ollivier Robert Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 96. Mar 10 Pawel Jakub Dawidek Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 97. Mar 10 Borja Marcos Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 98. Mar 10 Borja Marcos Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 99. Mar 10 Pawel Jakub Dawidek Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 100. Mar 10 Andriy Gapon Re: Many processes stuck in zfs
101. Mar 10 Pawel Jakub Dawidek Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 102. Mar 11 Alexander Leidinger Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 103. Mar 11 Borja Marcos Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 104. Mar 11 Alexander Leidinger Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 105. Mar 11 Alexander Leidinger Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 106. Mar 11 Ivan Voras Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 107. Mar 11 Borja Marcos Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 108. Mar 12 Alexander Leidinger Re: Many processes stuck in zfs 109. Mar 7 Rick Macklem Re: mbuf leakage with nfs/zfs? 110. Mar 7 Robert Watson net.inet.tcp.timer_race: does anyone have a non-zero value? 111. Mar 7 Mikolaj Golub Re: net.inet.tcp.timer_race: does anyone have a non-zero value? 112. Mar 7 Robert N. M. Watson Re: net.inet.tcp.timer_race: does anyone have a non-zero value? 113. Mar 9 Dominic Fandrey ntpd does not re-query servers, when a new interface appears 114. Mar 9 Ian Smith Re: ntpd does not re-query servers, when a new interface appears 115. Mar 9 Jeremy Chadwick Re: ntpd does not re-query servers, when a new interface appears 116. Mar 9 Dominic Fandrey Re: ntpd does not re-query servers, when a new interface appears 117. Mar 9 Jeremy Chadwick Re: ntpd does not re-query servers, when a new interface appears 118. Mar 9 Jeremy Chadwick Re: ntpd does not re-query servers, when a new interface appears 119. Mar 9 Ian Smith Re: ntpd does not re-query servers, when a new interface appears 120. Mar 10 Dominic Fandrey Re: ntpd does not re-query servers, when a new interface appears
121. Mar 10 David Magda Re: ntpd does not re-query servers, when a new interface appears 122. Mar 10 Dominic Fandrey Re: ntpd does not re-query servers, when a new interface appears 123. Mar 7 Christian Weisgerber ntpd multicast TTL 124. Mar 8 John Marshall Re: ntpd multicast TTL 125. Mar 7 Torfinn Ingolfsen Re: panic - sleeping thread on FreeBSD 8.0-stable / amd64 126. Mar 13 Torfinn Ingolfsen Re: panic - sleeping thread on FreeBSD 8.0-stable / amd64 127. Mar 13 Jeremy Chadwick Re: panic - sleeping thread on FreeBSD 8.0-stable / amd64 128. Mar 13 Torfinn Ingolfsen Re: panic - sleeping thread on FreeBSD 8.0-stable / amd64 129. Mar 13 Jeremy Chadwick Re: panic - sleeping thread on FreeBSD 8.0-stable / amd64 130. Mar 13 Torfinn Ingolfsen Re: panic - sleeping thread on FreeBSD 8.0-stable / amd64 131. Mar 9 Thomas Jepsen Please unsubscribe 132. Mar 8 Dan Naumov powerd on 8.0, is it considered safe? 133. Mar 8 Jeremy Chadwick Re: powerd on 8.0, is it considered safe? 134. Mar 8 Dan Naumov RE: powerd on 8.0, is it considered safe? 135. Mar 8 Dan Naumov RE: powerd on 8.0, is it considered safe? 136. Mar 8 Tim Judd Re: powerd on 8.0, is it considered safe? 137. Mar 8 Alexander Motin Re: powerd on 8.0, is it considered safe? 138. Mar 8 Alexander Motin Re: powerd on 8.0, is it considered safe? 139. Mar 8 Dan Naumov Re: powerd on 8.0, is it considered safe? 140. Mar 11 Kai Gallasch proliant server lockups with freebsd-amd64-stable (2010-03-10)
141. Mar 11 Mark Atkinson Re: proliant server lockups with freebsd-amd64-stable (2010-03-10) 142. Mar 11 Andriy Gapon Re: proliant server lockups with freebsd-amd64-stable (2010-03-10) 143. Mar 12 Pawel Jakub Dawidek Re: proliant server lockups with freebsd-amd64-stable (2010-03-10) 144. Mar 12 Alexander Motin Re: proliant server lockups with freebsd-amd64-stable (2010-03-10) 145. Mar 12 Kai Gallasch Re: proliant server lockups with freebsd-amd64-stable (2010-03-10) 146. Mar 12 Alexander Motin Re: proliant server lockups with freebsd-amd64-stable (2010-03-10) 147. Mar 12 Steve Polyack rc.d/rc.subr support for multiple FIBs 148. Mar 12 Brandon Gooch Re: rc.d/rc.subr support for multiple FIBs 149. Mar 7 Igor Lyapin (LinkedIn Invi Reminder about your invitation from Igor Lyapin 150. Mar 8 Ling-hua Tseng Supplementary groups on LDAP cannot work with RELENG_8 + nss_ldap 151. Mar 9 Peter C. Lai Re: Supplementary groups on LDAP cannot work with RELENG_8 + nss_ldap 152. Mar 9 Linghua Tseng Re: Supplementary groups on LDAP cannot work with RELENG_8 +nss_ldap 153. Mar 9 Greg Byshenk Re: Supplementary groups on LDAP cannot work with RELENG_8 +nss_ldap 154. Mar 10 Linghua Tseng Re: Supplementary groups on LDAP cannot work with RELENG_8 +nss_ldap 155. Mar 10 Ricardo Campos Passanezi Re: Supplementary groups on LDAP cannot work with RELENG_8 +nss_ldap 156. Mar 10 Linghua Tseng Re: Supplementary groups on LDAP cannot work with RELENG_8 +nss_ldap 157. Mar 8 Karl Denninger Re: Survey results very helpful, thanks! 158. Mar 8 Robert Watson Survey results very helpful, thanks! (was: Re: net.inet.tcp.timer_race: does anyon 159. Mar 8 Doug Hardie Re: Survey results very helpful, thanks! (was: Re: net.inet.tcp.timer_race: does a 160. Mar 8 Robert Watson Re: Survey results very helpful, thanks! (was: Re: net.inet.tcp.timer_race: does a
161. Mar 9 Doug Hardie Re: Survey results very helpful, thanks! (was: Re: net.inet.tcp.timer_race: does a 162. Mar 10 =?koi8-r?Q?=ED=C9=C8=C1=C9 ugen kernel module? 163. Mar 10 Dan Nelson Re: ugen kernel module? 164. Mar 7 Alexander Eichner Re: virtualbox status on 8.0-STABLE i386 165. Mar 8 Mikolaj Golub Re: virtualbox status on 8.0-STABLE i386 166. Mar 8 Steve Polyack ZFS hot spares 167. Mar 9 Pawel Jakub Dawidek Re: ZFS hot spares 168. Mar 9 Steve Polyack Re: ZFS hot spares 169. Mar 10 Adam Stylinski ZFS question 170. Mar 10 Wiktor Niesiobedzki Re: ZFS question 171. Mar 10 Stefan Bethke Re: ZFS question
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date