2016/freebsd-toolchain/20160529.freebsd-toolchain
Messages: 34, sorted by subject
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:24:35 UTC 2023
|
|
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. May 26 Mark Millard 11.0-CURRENT -r300770 libc++ update vs. lang/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc: no go [self 2. May 27 Dimitry Andric Re: 11.0-CURRENT -r300770 libc++ update vs. lang/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc: no go [ 3. May 27 Mark Millard Re: 11.0-CURRENT -r300770 libc++ update vs. lang/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc: no go [ 4. May 27 Mark Millard Re: 11.0-CURRENT -r300770 libc++ update vs. lang/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc: no go [ 5. May 28 Mark Millard Re: 11.0-CURRENT -r300770 libc++ update vs. lang/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc: no go [ 6. May 28 Mark Millard Re: 11.0-CURRENT -r300770 libc++ update vs. lang/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc: no go [ 7. May 28 Dimitry Andric Re: 11.0-CURRENT -r300770 libc++ update vs. lang/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc: no go [ 8. May 28 Mark Millard Re: 11.0-CURRENT -r300770 libc++ update vs. lang/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc: no go [ 9. May 28 Mark Millard Re: 11.0-CURRENT -r300770 libc++ update vs. lang/powerpc64-xtoolchain-gcc: no go [ 10. May 25 Mark Millard 11.0-CURRENT: lang/gcc, lang/gcc5, lang/gcc6-devel, lang/llvm38, etc. do not build 11. May 26 Mark Millard Are there SPARC [or other] aligned memory access requirements to avoid exceptions? 12. May 27 Cedric Blancher Re: Are there SPARC [or other] aligned memory access requirements to avoid excepti 13. May 27 Mark Millard Re: Are there SPARC [or other] aligned memory access requirements to avoid excepti 14. May 27 Cedric Blancher Re: Are there SPARC [or other] aligned memory access requirements to avoid excepti 15. May 27 Matthias Andree Re: Are there SPARC [or other] aligned memory access requirements to avoid excepti 16. May 27 Mark Millard Re: Are there SPARC [or other] aligned memory access requirements to avoid excepti 17. May 27 Mark Cave-Ayland Re: Are there SPARC [or other] aligned memory access requirements to avoid excepti 18. May 27 Ian Lepore Re: Are there SPARC [or other] aligned memory access requirements to avoid excepti 19. May 27 Ian Lepore Re: Are there SPARC [or other] aligned memory access requirements to avoid excepti 20. May 27 Bryan Drewery Re: svn commit: r297435 - head: still problems for stage 3 when gcc 4.2.1 is avoid
21. May 28 Mark Millard Re: svn commit: r297435 - head: still problems for stage 3 when gcc 4.2.1 is avoid 22. May 28 Bryan Drewery Re: svn commit: r297435 - head: still problems for stage 3 when gcc 4.2.1 is avoid 23. May 28 Mark Millard Re: svn commit: r297435 - head: still problems for stage 3 when gcc 4.2.1 is avoid 24. May 28 Mark Millard Re: svn commit: r297435 - head: still problems for stage 3 when gcc 4.2.1 is avoid 25. May 28 Mark Millard Re: svn commit: r297435 - head: still problems for stage 3 when gcc 4.2.1 is avoid 26. May 28 Mark Millard Re: svn commit: r297435 - head: still problems for stage 3 when gcc 4.2.1 is avoid 27. May 28 Adrian Chadd Re: svn commit: r297435 - head: still problems for stage 3 when gcc 4.2.1 is avoid 28. May 28 Mark Millard Re: svn commit: r297435 - head: still problems for stage 3 when gcc 4.2.1 is avoid 29. May 23 Bryan Drewery WITH_SYSTEM_COMPILER: Skip Clang/GCC bootstrap [Critical note for Toolchain change 30. May 23 Mark Millard Re: WITH_SYSTEM_COMPILER: Skip Clang/GCC bootstrap [Critical note for Toolchain ch 31. May 23 Bryan Drewery Re: WITH_SYSTEM_COMPILER: Skip Clang/GCC bootstrap [Critical note for Toolchain ch 32. May 23 Mark Millard Re: WITH_SYSTEM_COMPILER: Skip Clang/GCC bootstrap [Critical note for Toolchain ch 33. May 26 Mark Millard Re: xorg broken on Beaglebone black revision 300438 [some armv7 instructions do no 34. May 26 Mark Millard Re: xorg broken on Beaglebone black revision 300438 [some armv7 instructions do no
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date