Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)

2020/freebsd-toolchain/20200405.freebsd-toolchain

Messages: 18, sorted by subject
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:24:44 UTC 2023

home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Mar 31 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 230454] Compiling world fails on /usr/src/contrib/llvm/tools/clang/lib/CodeGe
  2. Mar 31 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 230888] Missing 64 bit atomic functions for i386 (libatomic)
  3. Mar 31 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 230888] Missing 64 bit atomic functions for i386 (libatomic)
  4. Mar 31 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 230888] Missing 64 bit atomic functions for i386 (libatomic)
  5. Mar 31 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 230888] Missing 64 bit atomic functions for i386 (libatomic)
  6. Apr  3 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 238129] Please enable the type __float128 that is already supported by clang
  7. Mar 31 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 244830] net-p2p/libtorrent-rasterbar: clang 10 crashes during build
  8. Mar 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 245046] Error while building FreeBSD 12.1 releng
  9. Mar 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 245179] lld: wrong/misleading "SHF_MERGE section size must be a multiple of s
 10. Mar 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 245179] lld: wrong/misleading "SHF_MERGE section size must be a multiple of s
 11. Mar 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 245179] lld: wrong/misleading "SHF_MERGE section size must be a multiple of s
 12. Mar 30 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 245179] lld: wrong/misleading "SHF_MERGE section size must be a multiple of s
 13. Mar 31 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 245179] lld: wrong/misleading "SHF_MERGE section size must be a multiple of s
 14. Mar 29 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for toolchain@FreeBSD.org that need special attention
 15. Mar 30 Paul Floyd                 x86 process memory map
 16. Mar 30 Konstantin Belousov         Re: x86 process memory map
 17. Mar 30 Paul FLOYD                  Re: x86 process memory map
 18. Mar 31 Paul FLOYD                  Re: x86 process memory map


home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date