2024/freebsd-toolchain/20240212.freebsd-toolchain
Messages: 34, sorted by subject
|
Last update: Mon Feb 12 0:07:01 2024
|
|
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Feb 8 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 264408] clang-14 crashes on the port graphics/dcmtk on aarch64 2. Feb 8 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276632] LLVM std::filesystem::remove_all fails to handle dangling symlinks 3. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276703] clang crashes on the port www/ladybird on 15 (CURRENT) on amd64: Asse 4. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276703] clang crashes on the port www/ladybird on 15 (CURRENT) on amd64: Asse 5. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276703] clang crashes on the port www/ladybird on 15 (CURRENT) on amd64: Asse 6. Feb 9 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 276738] clang: static_assert conflicts with -std=c++98 -pedantic-errors 7. Feb 9 Paul Floyd debuginfo changes 8. Feb 10 Paul Floyd Re: debuginfo changes 9. Feb 6 Mark Millard devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/local 10. Feb 6 Brooks Davis Re: devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/l 11. Feb 6 Mark Millard Re: devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/l 12. Feb 6 Mark Millard For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.s 13. Feb 6 Mark Millard Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 14. Feb 7 Mark Millard Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 15. Feb 7 Brooks Davis Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 16. Feb 7 Mark Millard Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 17. Feb 8 Brooks Davis Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 18. Feb 8 Mark Millard lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 19. Feb 9 Gerald Pfeifer Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 20. Feb 9 Mark Millard Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main
21. Feb 9 Konstantin Belousov Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 22. Feb 7 Mark Millard Mk/Uses/llvm.mk is going to need _LLVM_MK_VALID_VERSIONS to also list 18 23. Feb 11 bugzilla-noreply@FreeBSD.o Problem reports for toolchain@FreeBSD.org that need special attention 24. Feb 6 Mark Millard Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude FLA 25. Feb 6 Brooks Davis Re: Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude 26. Feb 6 Mark Millard Re: Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude 27. Feb 6 Mark Millard Why does Mk/Uses/compiler.mk have code for "# clang not always supported on Tier-2 28. Feb 6 Brooks Davis Re: Why does Mk/Uses/compiler.mk have code for "# clang not always supported on Ti 29. Feb 8 Mark Millard Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler 30. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= comp 31. Feb 8 Dimitry Andric Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= comp 32. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= comp 33. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= comp 34. Feb 8 Mark Millard Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= comp
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date