2006/freebsd-arch/20060129.freebsd-arch
Messages: 62, sorted by subject
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:14:19 UTC 2023
|
|
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Jan 24 John Baldwin [PATCH] Initial (working!) version of rwlocks 2. Jan 24 Poul-Henning Kamp [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 3. Jan 24 John Baldwin Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 4. Jan 24 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 5. Jan 24 John Baldwin Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 6. Jan 25 Alexander Leidinger Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 7. Jan 25 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 8. Jan 25 Alexander Leidinger Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 9. Jan 25 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 10. Jan 25 Ian FREISLICH Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 11. Jan 25 Alexander Leidinger Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 12. Jan 25 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 13. Jan 25 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 14. Jan 25 Peter Jeremy Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 15. Jan 25 Scott Long Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 16. Jan 25 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 17. Jan 26 Kris Kennaway Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 18. Jan 26 Ian FREISLICH Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 19. Jan 26 Brian Candler Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 20. Jan 26 Marius Strobl Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
21. Jan 26 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 22. Jan 27 Thomas Sparrevohn Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 23. Jan 27 John-Mark Gurney Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 24. Jan 27 Kevin Oberman Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 25. Jan 27 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 26. Jan 27 Mike Jakubik Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 27. Jan 27 Brian Candler Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 28. Jan 27 Mike Jakubik Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 29. Jan 27 John-Mark Gurney Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 30. Jan 27 Kevin Oberman Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 31. Jan 27 Garance A Drosihn Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 32. Jan 27 John Baldwin Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 33. Jan 27 John Baldwin Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 34. Jan 27 Mullen, Adam RE: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 35. Jan 27 Frank Mayhar RE: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 36. Jan 27 Garance A Drosihn RE: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 37. Jan 27 Mike Jakubik Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 38. Jan 27 Mike Jakubik Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 39. Jan 27 Garance A Drosehn Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 40. Jan 27 Scott Long Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches
41. Jan 27 Brooks Davis Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 42. Jan 28 Andre Guibert de Bruet Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 43. Jan 28 Thomas Sparrevohn Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 44. Jan 28 Thomas Sparrevohn Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 45. Jan 25 Max Laier Re: firmware loading 46. Jan 27 Gleb Smirnoff fix return code for pipe(2) syscall 47. Jan 27 Garrett Wollman Re: fix return code for pipe(2) syscall 48. Jan 27 Julian Elischer Re: fix return code for pipe(2) syscall 49. Jan 27 Matthew D. Fuller Re: fix return code for pipe(2) syscall 50. Jan 27 Mullen, Adam FW: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches 51. Jan 23 Jeff Roberson Re: Large virtual page size support. 52. Jan 23 Scott Long Re: Large virtual page size support. 53. Jan 25 Jeff Roberson Re: Large virtual page size support. 54. Jan 25 Scott Long Re: Large virtual page size support. 55. Jan 25 Julian Elischer Re: Large virtual page size support. 56. Jan 25 David Xu vfs_aio.c is still not safe 57. Jan 25 =?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_ Re: vfs_aio.c is still not safe 58. Jan 26 David Xu Re: vfs_aio.c is still not safe 59. Jan 26 Julian Elischer Re: vfs_aio.c is still not safe 60. Jan 26 David Xu Re: vfs_aio.c is still not safe
61. Jan 26 David Xu Re: vfs_aio.c is still not safe 62. Jan 26 Julian Elischer Re: vfs_aio.c is still not safe
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date