Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)

2010/freebsd-emulation/20100307.freebsd-emulation

Messages: 45, sorted by subject
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:15:54 UTC 2023

home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Mar  1 John Baldwin               Re: 32 bit Linux lseek missing overflow check (was: Re: Linuxolator patches: stat 
  2. Mar  2 John Baldwin                Re: 32 bit Linux lseek missing overflow check (was: Re: Linuxolator patches: stat 
  3. Mar  2 Juergen Lock                Re: 32 bit Linux lseek missing overflow check (was: Re: Linuxolator patches: stat 
  4. Mar  3 John Nielsen               64-bit Linux emulation status?
  5. Mar  3 Nenhum_de_Nos               Re: 64-bit Linux emulation status?
  6. Mar  4 Hubert Tournier            Re: [PATCH] VirtualBox headless VNC support by LibVNCServer
  7. Mar  5 Daisuke Aoyama              Re: [PATCH] VirtualBox headless VNC support by LibVNCServer
  8. Mar  5 Hubert Tournier             Re: [PATCH] VirtualBox headless VNC support by LibVNCServer
  9. Mar  1 FreeBSD bugmaster          Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org
 10. Mar  3 Pro Auction Ltd            Event closing today
 11. Mar  1 Alfred Perlstein           Is there an equiv of Linux KVM for FreeBSD?
 12. Mar  3 Juergen Lock                Re: Is there an equiv of Linux KVM for FreeBSD?
 13. Mar  4 Ivan Voras                  Re: Is there an equiv of Linux KVM for FreeBSD?
 14. Mar  2 John Nielsen               linux-only jail possible?
 15. Mar  2 Andrew Hotlab               RE: linux-only jail possible?
 16. Mar  2 John Nielsen                Re: linux-only jail possible?
 17. Mar  2 Miroslav Lachman            Re: linux-only jail possible?
 18. Mar  3 Roman Divacky               Re: linux-only jail possible?
 19. Mar  3 John Nielsen                Re: linux-only jail possible?
 20. Mar  3 Roman Divacky               Re: linux-only jail possible?


21. Mar 4 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 22. Mar 5 Alexander Leidinger Re: linux-only jail possible? 23. Mar 5 Ed Schouten Re: linux-only jail possible? 24. Mar 6 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 25. Mar 6 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 26. Mar 6 Ed Schouten Re: linux-only jail possible? 27. Mar 6 Ed Schouten Re: linux-only jail possible? 28. Mar 6 Gary Jennejohn Re: linux-only jail possible? 29. Mar 6 Alexander Leidinger Re: linux-only jail possible? 30. Mar 6 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 31. Mar 6 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 32. Mar 6 Ed Schouten Re: linux-only jail possible? 33. Mar 1 Adam K Kirchhoff Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 34. Mar 2 Alexander Eichner Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 35. Mar 2 Adam K Kirchhoff Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 36. Mar 2 Enrico M. Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 37. Mar 2 Adam K Kirchhoff Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 38. Mar 3 Adam K Kirchhoff Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 39. Mar 4 Wolfgang Riegler VirtualBox Headless inside a jail 40. Mar 5 Julian Elischer Re: VirtualBox Headless inside a jail
41. Mar 6 Mikolaj Golub virtualbox status on 8.0-STABLE i386 42. Mar 6 Enrico Mancini Re: virtualbox status on 8.0-STABLE i386 43. Mar 6 Mikolaj Golub Re: virtualbox status on 8.0-STABLE i386 44. Mar 3 Per Hedeland VirtualBox won't start 45. Mar 1 Brandon Gooch Re: ZFS and sh(1) panic: spin lock [lock addr] (smp rendezvous) held by [sh(1) pro


home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date