2010/freebsd-emulation/20100307.freebsd-emulation
Messages: 45, sorted by subject
|
Last page update: Sat Jan 3 13:07:47 UTC 2026
|
|
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
1. Mar 1 John Baldwin Re: 32 bit Linux lseek missing overflow check (was: Re: Linuxolator patches: stat and lseek SEEK_END for disk devices) 2. Mar 2 John Baldwin Re: 32 bit Linux lseek missing overflow check (was: Re: Linuxolator patches: stat and lseek SEEK_END for disk devices) 3. Mar 2 Juergen Lock Re: 32 bit Linux lseek missing overflow check (was: Re: Linuxolator patches: stat and lseek SEEK_END for disk devices) 4. Mar 3 John Nielsen 64-bit Linux emulation status? 5. Mar 3 Nenhum_de_Nos Re: 64-bit Linux emulation status? 6. Mar 4 Hubert Tournier Re: [PATCH] VirtualBox headless VNC support by LibVNCServer 7. Mar 5 Daisuke Aoyama Re: [PATCH] VirtualBox headless VNC support by LibVNCServer 8. Mar 5 Hubert Tournier Re: [PATCH] VirtualBox headless VNC support by LibVNCServer 9. Mar 1 FreeBSD bugmaster Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org 10. Mar 3 Pro Auction Ltd Event closing today 11. Mar 1 Alfred Perlstein Is there an equiv of Linux KVM for FreeBSD? 12. Mar 3 Juergen Lock Re: Is there an equiv of Linux KVM for FreeBSD? 13. Mar 4 Ivan Voras Re: Is there an equiv of Linux KVM for FreeBSD? 14. Mar 2 John Nielsen linux-only jail possible? 15. Mar 2 Andrew Hotlab RE: linux-only jail possible? 16. Mar 2 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 17. Mar 2 Miroslav Lachman Re: linux-only jail possible? 18. Mar 3 Roman Divacky Re: linux-only jail possible? 19. Mar 3 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 20. Mar 3 Roman Divacky Re: linux-only jail possible?
21. Mar 4 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 22. Mar 5 Alexander Leidinger Re: linux-only jail possible? 23. Mar 5 Ed Schouten Re: linux-only jail possible? 24. Mar 6 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 25. Mar 6 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 26. Mar 6 Ed Schouten Re: linux-only jail possible? 27. Mar 6 Ed Schouten Re: linux-only jail possible? 28. Mar 6 Gary Jennejohn Re: linux-only jail possible? 29. Mar 6 Alexander Leidinger Re: linux-only jail possible? 30. Mar 6 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 31. Mar 6 John Nielsen Re: linux-only jail possible? 32. Mar 6 Ed Schouten Re: linux-only jail possible? 33. Mar 1 Adam K Kirchhoff Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 34. Mar 2 Alexander Eichner Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 35. Mar 2 Adam K Kirchhoff Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 36. Mar 2 Enrico M. Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 37. Mar 2 Adam K Kirchhoff Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 38. Mar 3 Adam K Kirchhoff Re: Patch to fix VirtualBox with recent kernel versions 39. Mar 4 Wolfgang Riegler VirtualBox Headless inside a jail 40. Mar 5 Julian Elischer Re: VirtualBox Headless inside a jail
41. Mar 6 Mikolaj Golub virtualbox status on 8.0-STABLE i386 42. Mar 6 Enrico Mancini Re: virtualbox status on 8.0-STABLE i386 43. Mar 6 Mikolaj Golub Re: virtualbox status on 8.0-STABLE i386 44. Mar 3 Per Hedeland VirtualBox won't start 45. Mar 1 Brandon Gooch Re: ZFS and sh(1) panic: spin lock [lock addr] (smp rendezvous) held by [sh(1) proc tid] too long
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date