2011/freebsd-stable/20111225.freebsd-stable
Messages: 181, sorted by subject
|
Last page update: Sat Jan 3 13:14:12 UTC 2026
|
|
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
1. Dec 21 1126 "required by"? 2. Dec 21 Mike Tancsa Re: "required by"? 3. Dec 21 Bartosz Fabianowski Re: "required by"? 4. Dec 20 Karl M. Joch 8.2 Problem with creating Snapshots on large file systems? Cannot backup anymore. 5. Dec 18 Andrey V. Elsukov Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19 6. Dec 18 Randy Bush Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19 7. Dec 18 Jeremy Chadwick Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19 8. Dec 18 Randy Bush Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19 9. Dec 18 Kevin Oberman Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19 10. Dec 18 Randy Bush Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19 11. Dec 19 Randy Bush Re: 8.2->9.prerel: gmirror failed with error 19 12. Dec 20 Patrick Lamaiziere [9.0-RC3] tar xf with zip archive is broken 13. Dec 20 Martin Matuska Re: [9.0-RC3] tar xf with zip archive is broken 14. Dec 20 Dominic Fandrey Re: battery display broken 15. Dec 20 Ian Smith Re: battery display broken 16. Dec 16 <matthew@phoronix.com> Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 17. Dec 19 Lev Serebryakov Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 18. Dec 19 Lev Serebryakov Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 19. Dec 19 O. Hartmann Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 20. Dec 19 Samuel J. Greear Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
21. Dec 19 Edho Arief Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 22. Dec 19 Andreas Nilsson Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 23. Dec 19 Alexander Yerenkow Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 24. Dec 19 O. Hartmann Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 25. Dec 20 Christer Solskogen Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 26. Dec 20 Christer Solskogen Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 27. Dec 20 Garrett Cooper Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 28. Dec 20 Christer Solskogen Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 29. Dec 20 Garrett Cooper Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 30. Dec 20 Igor Mozolevsky Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 31. Dec 20 O. Hartmann Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 32. Dec 20 Samuel J. Greear Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 33. Dec 20 O. Hartmann Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 34. Dec 20 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 35. Dec 20 Matthew Tippett Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 36. Dec 21 O. Hartmann Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 37. Dec 21 Matthew Tippett Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 38. Dec 21 Adrian Chadd Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 39. Dec 21 <matthew@phoronix.com> Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 40. Dec 21 Michael Larabel Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server
41. Dec 21 Ian Smith Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 42. Dec 21 Michael Larabel Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 43. Dec 21 Stefan Esser Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 44. Dec 21 Francois Tigeot Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 45. Dec 21 Alexander Leidinger Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 46. Dec 22 O. Hartmann Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 47. Dec 22 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 48. Dec 23 Garrett Cooper Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 49. Dec 23 Vincent Hoffman Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 50. Dec 23 John Baldwin Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 51. Dec 23 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 52. Dec 23 O. Hartmann Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 53. Dec 23 Garrett Cooper Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 54. Dec 24 Vincent Hoffman Re: Benchmark (Phoronix): FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 vs. Oracle Linux 6.1 Server 55. Dec 21 Andrey Zonov Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state 56. Dec 22 Kostik Belousov Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state 57. Dec 23 Alan Cox Re: directory listing hangs in "ufs" state 58. Dec 22 1126 emacs-devel glib-warning 59. Dec 22 John Baldwin Re: emacs-devel glib-warning 60. Dec 23 Denise H. G. Re: emacs-devel glib-warning
61. Dec 23 Damien Fleuriot FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 62. Dec 23 John Baldwin Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 63. Dec 23 Damien Fleuriot Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 64. Dec 23 Joe Holden Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 65. Dec 23 Damien Fleuriot Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 66. Dec 23 Joe Holden Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 67. Dec 23 Damien Fleuriot Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 68. Dec 23 Damien Fleuriot Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 69. Dec 23 Mike Tancsa Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 70. Dec 23 Shawn Webb Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 71. Dec 23 Bas Smeelen Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 72. Dec 23 Karl Denninger Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 73. Dec 23 Stephen Montgomery-Smith Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 74. Dec 23 Mehmet Erol Sanliturk Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 75. Dec 23 Stephen Montgomery-Smith Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 76. Dec 23 Bas Smeelen Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 77. Dec 23 George Kontostanos Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 78. Dec 23 Michael Butler Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 79. Dec 23 Mike Tancsa Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 80. Dec 23 Guy Helmer Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool
81. Dec 23 George Kontostanos Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 82. Dec 23 Matthew Seaman Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 83. Dec 23 George Kontostanos Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 84. Dec 23 rloefgren@forethought.net Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 85. Dec 23 Lars Engels Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 86. Dec 23 George Kontostanos Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 87. Dec 23 Eitan Adler Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 88. Dec 23 Peter Jeremy Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 89. Dec 23 Gary Palmer Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 90. Dec 23 George Kontostanos Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 91. Dec 23 Shawn Webb Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 92. Dec 23 George Kontostanos Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 93. Dec 23 Peter Jeremy Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 94. Dec 23 George Kontostanos Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 95. Dec 24 Kurt Buff Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 96. Dec 24 Jeremy Chadwick Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 97. Dec 24 Kurt Buff Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 98. Dec 24 Chris Rees Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool 99. Dec 21 Joshua Boyd Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox 100. Dec 21 Joshua Boyd FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox
101. Dec 21 Johan Hendriks Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox 102. Dec 21 Mike Tancsa Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox 103. Dec 22 perryh@pluto.rain.com Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox 104. Dec 22 Adam Vande More Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox 105. Dec 22 Joshua Boyd Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox 106. Dec 22 Jim King Re: FreeBSD 9 RC3 and VirtualBox 107. Dec 18 Paul Mather Re: fsck_ufs out of swapspace 108. Dec 19 Michiel Boland Re: fsck_ufs out of swapspace 109. Dec 20 Peter Jeremy Re: fsck_ufs out of swapspace 110. Dec 20 Kostik Belousov Re: fsck_ufs out of swapspace 111. Dec 20 Peter Holm Re: fsck_ufs out of swapspace 112. Dec 23 Damien Fleuriot Goo lists to subscribe to hear quickly about vulns ? ( was: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool) 113. Dec 23 Shawn Webb Re: Goo lists to subscribe to hear quickly about vulns ? ( was: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool) 114. Dec 23 Bas Smeelen Re: Goo lists to subscribe to hear quickly about vulns ? ( was: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool) 115. Dec 23 Matthew Seaman Re: Goo lists to subscribe to hear quickly about vulns ? ( was: Re: FLAME - security advisories on the 23rd ? uncool idea is uncool) 116. Dec 20 Claude Buisson Is the svn2cvs gateway down ? 117. Dec 20 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: Is the svn2cvs gateway down ? 118. Dec 21 Doug Barton Re: Is the svn2cvs gateway down ? 119. Dec 21 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: Is the svn2cvs gateway down ? 120. Dec 22 Charlie Martin Mystery panic, FreeBSD 7.2-PRE
121. Dec 23 Jeremy Chadwick Re: Mystery panic, FreeBSD 7.2-PRE 122. Dec 23 Kostik Belousov Re: Mystery panic, FreeBSD 7.2-PRE 123. Dec 23 Charlie Martin Re: Mystery panic, FreeBSD 7.2-PRE 124. Dec 15 Jack Raats network with two gateways and one network card 125. Dec 23 Charlie Martin PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=4096? 126. Dec 23 Andriy Gapon Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=4096? 127. Dec 23 Jeremy Chadwick Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=4096? 128. Dec 23 Charlie Martin Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=4096? 129. Dec 24 Jeremy Chadwick Re: PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=4096? 130. Dec 21 Daniel Gerzo REMAINDER: Call for FreeBSD Status Reports - 4Q/2011 131. Dec 18 Bruce Cran Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 132. Dec 18 Adrian Chadd Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 133. Dec 18 Ian Smith Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 134. Dec 18 Andrey Chernov Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 135. Dec 18 Alexander Best Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 136. Dec 18 Alexander Best Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 137. Dec 18 O. Hartmann Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 138. Dec 18 Adrian Chadd Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 139. Dec 18 Adrian Chadd Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 140. Dec 19 Ivan Klymenko Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
141. Dec 19 Andriy Gapon Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 142. Dec 19 Alexander Best Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 143. Dec 22 Steve Kargl Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 144. Dec 22 Adrian Chadd Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 145. Dec 22 Luigi Rizzo Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 146. Dec 22 George Mitchell Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 147. Dec 22 Steve Kargl Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 148. Dec 22 Oliver Brandmueller Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 149. Dec 22 Steve Kargl Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 150. Dec 22 Steve Kargl Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 151. Dec 22 Andriy Gapon Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 152. Dec 22 Steve Kargl Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 153. Dec 22 Andriy Gapon Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 154. Dec 23 Adrian Chadd Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 155. Dec 23 Doug Barton Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 156. Dec 23 Steve Kargl Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 157. Dec 23 Steve Kargl Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 158. Dec 23 Adrian Chadd Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 159. Dec 23 Andriy Gapon Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 160. Dec 23 Steve Kargl Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default
161. Dec 24 Daniel Kalchev Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 162. Dec 24 Stefan Esser Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 163. Dec 24 Adrian Chadd Re: SCHED_ULE should not be the default 164. Dec 20 Mark Linimon status of ports and clang 165. Dec 21 Ivan Voras Unbalanced timer interrupts under VMWare? 166. Dec 21 Maxim Dounin Re: Unbalanced timer interrupts under VMWare? 167. Dec 21 Ivan Voras Re: Unbalanced timer interrupts under VMWare? 168. Dec 20 Ganael LAPLANCHE Using mmap(2) with a hint address 169. Dec 20 Andriy Gapon Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address 170. Dec 20 Tijl Coosemans Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address 171. Dec 20 Ganael LAPLANCHE Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address 172. Dec 20 Ganael LAPLANCHE Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address 173. Dec 20 Andriy Gapon Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address 174. Dec 20 Ganael LAPLANCHE Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address 175. Dec 20 Tijl Coosemans Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address 176. Dec 20 Artem Belevich Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address 177. Dec 22 Ganael LAPLANCHE Re: Using mmap(2) with a hint address 178. Dec 20 O. Hartmann x11/sessreg: build fails with CLANG in FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE 179. Dec 20 O. Hartmann Re: x11/sessreg: build fails with CLANG in FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE 180. Dec 20 Michiel Boland Re: x11/sessreg: build fails with CLANG in FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE
181. Dec 20 O. Hartmann Re: x11/sessreg: build fails with CLANG in FreeBSD 9.0-PRERELEASE
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date