Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)

2014/freebsd-ruby/20141123.freebsd-ruby

Messages: 15, sorted by subject
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:20:53 UTC 2023
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date 
  1. Nov 16 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 194673] [new port] sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_ssh
  2. Nov 16 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 194673] [new port] sysutils/rubygem-hammer_cli_foreman_ssh
  3. Nov 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 195268] [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build for ruby 2.0
  4. Nov 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o  [Bug 195268] [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build for ruby 2.0
  5. Nov 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 195268] New: [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build for ruby 2.0
  6. Nov 21 linimon@FreeBSD.org        FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken
  7. Nov 21 linimon@FreeBSD.org        FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently scheduled for deletion
  8. Nov 17 portscout@FreeBSD.org      FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
  9. Nov 18 portscout@FreeBSD.org       FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
 10. Nov 19 portscout@FreeBSD.org       FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
 11. Nov 21 portscout@FreeBSD.org       FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
 12. Nov 22 portscout@FreeBSD.org       FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date
 13. Nov 22 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o maintainer-feedback requested: [Bug 195268] [patch] archivers/ruby-lha: fix build 
 14. Nov 18 Matthew Closson            What determines whether a rubygem should be ported or not?
 15. Nov 19 Steve Wills                 Re: What determines whether a rubygem should be ported or not?

home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date