2017/freebsd-ports/20170625.freebsd-ports
Messages: 126, sorted by subject
|
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:22:30 UTC 2023
|
|
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
1. Jun 18 Steve Kargl [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision 2. Jun 18 Steve Kargl Re: [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision 3. Jun 20 Kubilay Kocak Re: [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision 4. Jun 20 Steve Kargl Re: [PATCH] lang/python27 -- Fix namespace collision 5. Jun 22 David Demelier [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 6. Jun 22 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 7. Jun 22 =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apesteg Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 8. Jun 22 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 9. Jun 22 Vlad K. Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 10. Jun 22 David Demelier Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 11. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 12. Jun 22 Baptiste Daroussin Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 13. Jun 22 David Demelier Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 14. Jun 22 Matthew Seaman Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 15. Jun 22 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 16. Jun 22 Torsten Zuehlsdorff Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 17. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 18. Jun 22 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 19. Jun 22 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 20. Jun 22 Torsten Zuehlsdorff Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version
21. Jun 22 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 22. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 23. Jun 22 Matthew Seaman Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 24. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 25. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 26. Jun 22 Dave Hayes Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 27. Jun 22 Dave Hayes Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 28. Jun 22 demelier.david@gmail.com Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 29. Jun 22 Dave Hayes Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 30. Jun 22 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 31. Jun 22 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 32. Jun 22 Miroslav Lachman Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 33. Jun 22 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 34. Jun 22 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 35. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 36. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 37. Jun 23 Kurt Jaeger Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 38. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 39. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 40. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version
41. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 42. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 43. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 44. Jun 23 Kurt Jaeger Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 45. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 46. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 47. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 48. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmail.com Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 49. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmail.com Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 50. Jun 23 Vlad K. Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 51. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmail.com Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 52. Jun 23 Guido Falsi Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 53. Jun 23 Matthew Seaman Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 54. Jun 23 demelier.david@gmail.com Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 55. Jun 23 Vlad K. Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 56. Jun 23 RW Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 57. Jun 23 <scratch65535@att.net> Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 58. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 59. Jun 23 Matt Smith Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 60. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version
61. Jun 23 Mark Linimon Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 62. Jun 23 Guido Falsi Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 63. Jun 23 Guido Falsi Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 64. Jun 23 Baho Utot Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 65. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 66. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 67. Jun 23 Julian Elischer Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 68. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 69. Jun 23 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 70. Jun 23 Michelle Sullivan Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 71. Jun 23 Vlad K. Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 72. Jun 23 Michelle Sullivan Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 73. Jun 24 =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=C3 Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 74. Jun 24 Thomas Mueller Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 75. Jun 24 Grzegorz Junka Re: [RFC] Why FreeBSD ports should have branches by OS version 76. Jun 23 abi [SAMBA] and file content caching 77. Jun 19 The Doctor Apache 2.4.26 78. Jun 24 Carmel NY clamav-unofficial-sigs 79. Jun 19 Xavi Garcia databases/mariadb101-client broken in the quarterly branch (libressl) 80. Jun 19 Xavi Garcia Re: databases/mariadb101-client broken in the quarterly branch (libressl)
81. Jun 24 Bob Eager Easytag crashes with SIGABRT - stack overflow 82. Jun 24 Steven Hartland Re: Easytag crashes with SIGABRT - stack overflow 83. Jun 24 Bob Eager Re: Easytag crashes with SIGABRT - stack overflow 84. Jun 19 Jeff Sickel FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-5.0.3 85. Jun 19 wen heping Re: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-5.0.3 86. Jun 19 DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Foru Re: FreeBSD Port: MailScanner-5.0.3 87. Jun 22 portscout@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date 88. Jun 24 Bruno Haible GNU libffcall 1.13 is released 89. Jun 24 Jov Re: GNU libffcall 1.13 is released 90. Jun 19 Global Test Market How much Is Your Opinion Worth? 91. Jun 18 Ben Lavery-Griffiths Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 92. Jun 18 Ultima Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 93. Jun 18 Ultima Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 94. Jun 19 Ben Lavery-Griffiths Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 95. Jun 19 Jaap Akkerhuis Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 96. Jun 19 Matt Smith Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 97. Jun 20 Jov Re: Keeping -CURRENT up to date with Poudriere 98. Jun 21 Andrea Venturoli net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails 99. Jun 21 Ryan Frederick Re: net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails 100. Jun 21 Ryan Frederick Re: net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails
101. Jun 22 Andrea Venturoli Re: net-mgmt/nagios-check_ports and jails 102. Jun 22 The Doctor NEW APR/APR-Utils 103. Jun 22 Andre Goree Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 104. Jun 23 Dewayne Geraghty Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 105. Jun 23 The Doctor Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 106. Jun 23 Dewayne Geraghty Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 107. Jun 23 The Doctor Re: NEW APR/APR-Utils 108. Jun 20 Jeffrey Bouquet perl problem 109. Jun 19 Thomas Mueller pkg convert? 110. Jun 19 Matthew Seaman Re: pkg convert? 111. Jun 20 Thomas Mueller Re: pkg convert? 112. Jun 21 Yuri Please commit the new port science/py-pymol: OpenGL based molecular visualization 113. Jun 23 Yasuhiro KIMURA PR commit request 114. Jun 22 =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apesteg PR needs care 115. Jun 19 Borodin Oleg Re: Questions about order of adding application to freebsd ports. 116. Jun 19 Kurt Jaeger Re: Questions about order of adding application to freebsd ports. 117. Jun 24 Peter Jeremy security/libressl not API-compatible with OpenSSL, breaks www/apache24 118. Jun 24 Adam Weinberger Re: security/libressl not API-compatible with OpenSSL, breaks www/apache24 119. Jun 24 Walter Schwarzenfeld Re: security/libressl not API-compatible with OpenSSL, breaks www/apache24 120. Jun 22 Rastko P Thunderbird + Lightning on FreeBSD
121. Jun 21 Carmel NY Update Postfix-current port. 122. Jun 21 Kurt Jaeger Re: Update Postfix-current port. 123. Jun 21 Kurt Jaeger Re: Update Postfix-current port. 124. Jun 23 George Mitchell www/libxul 125. Jun 23 Jan Beich Re: www/libxul 126. Jun 23 George Mitchell Re: www/libxul
home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date