2019/freebsd-ppc/20190217.freebsd-ppc
Messages: 38, sorted by subject
|
Last page update: Sat Jan 3 13:12:12 UTC 2026
|
|
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
1. Feb 11 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 234539] [PowerPC64] panic: FPU already enabled for thread 2. Feb 12 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 234539] [PowerPC64] panic: FPU already enabled for thread 3. Feb 14 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 234539] [PowerPC64] panic: FPU already enabled for thread 4. Feb 16 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 234539] [PowerPC64] panic: FPU already enabled for thread 5. Feb 10 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235634] p5-GSSAPI fails to build with OpenSSL from ports 6. Feb 10 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235634] security/p5-GSSAPI fails to build with OpenSSL from ports 7. Feb 10 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235634] security/p5-GSSAPI fails to build with OpenSSL from ports 8. Feb 10 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235634] security/p5-GSSAPI fails to build with OpenSSL from ports 9. Feb 10 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235634] security/p5-GSSAPI fails to build with OpenSSL from ports 10. Feb 10 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235634] security/p5-GSSAPI fails to build with OpenSSL from ports 11. Feb 10 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235634] security/p5-GSSAPI fails to build with OpenSSL from ports 12. Feb 15 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235751] Failure to init TLS variables with func ptr inside shared lib 13. Feb 15 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235751] Failure to init TLS variables with func ptr inside shared lib 14. Feb 15 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235751] Failure to init TLS variables with func ptr inside shared lib 15. Feb 15 bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.o [Bug 235751] Failure to init TLS variables with func ptr inside shared lib 16. Feb 15 Al Re: Netboot X5000 17. Feb 12 David Smith Opportunity Assessment of Blockchain Technology in the Telecom Industry 18. Feb 12 Mark Millard question powermac_smp_start_cpu return values vs. cpu_mp_unleash use of them (SMP context) 19. Feb 13 Mark Millard Questions with a powerpc64/powerpc context: relaxed use of smp_cpus in umtx_busy vs. relaxed updates to smp_cpus in machine dependent code? 20. Feb 13 Eric van Gyzen Re: Questions with a powerpc64/powerpc context: relaxed use of smp_cpus in umtx_busy vs. relaxed updates to smp_cpus in machine dependent code
21. Feb 14 Mark Millard Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 22. Feb 14 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 23. Feb 14 Dennis Clarke Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 24. Feb 14 Dennis Clarke Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 25. Feb 14 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 26. Feb 14 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 27. Feb 15 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 28. Feb 15 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 29. Feb 15 Justin Hibbits Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 30. Feb 15 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 31. Feb 15 Justin Hibbits Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 32. Feb 15 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 33. Feb 16 Justin Hibbits Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 34. Feb 16 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value 35. Feb 16 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value [found more staging info] 36. Feb 16 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value [found yet more staging info] 37. Feb 16 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value [found yet more staging info] 38. Feb 16 Mark Millard Re: Some evidence about the PowerMac G5 multiprocessor boot hang ups with the modern VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS value [found yet more staging info]
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date