Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)

2020/freebsd-arm/20201018.freebsd-arm

Messages: 72, sorted by subject
Last update: Mon Feb 13 14:14:44 UTC 2023

home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Oct 14 Mark Millard               64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but investi
  2. Oct 14 Klaus Cucinauomo            Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
  3. Oct 14 Mark Millard                Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
  4. Oct 14 Klaus Cucinauomo            Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
  5. Oct 14 Mark Millard                Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
  6. Oct 14 Klaus Cucinauomo            Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
  7. Oct 14 Klaus Cucinauomo            Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
  8. Oct 14 Mark Millard                Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
  9. Oct 14 Mark Millard                Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
 10. Oct 14 Mark Millard                Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
 11. Oct 14 Mark Millard                Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
 12. Oct 15 Robert Crowston             Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
 13. Oct 15 Klaus Cucinauomo            Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
 14. Oct 15 Mark Millard                Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
 15. Oct 15 Klaus Cucinauomo            Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
 16. Oct 16 Mark Millard                Re: 64-bit RPi4B u-boot hangup with modern rpi firmware: some information (but inv
 17. Oct 12 Mark Millard               Re: Adding a "-1" into https://reviews.freebsd.org/D25219 's code looks to make ue
 18. Oct 17 Dmitry Salychev            BBB image build compilation errors
 19. Oct 17 Mark Millard               Experience report: u-boot update 2020.07 -> 2020.10 seems to go fairly well on the
 20. Oct 12 ykla                       FreeBSD 13 not support boot form USB-MSD on rpi4.


21. Oct 12 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: FreeBSD 13 not support boot form USB-MSD on rpi4. 22. Oct 16 Michal Meloun Re: panic: non-current pmap 0xffffa00020eab8f0 on Rpi3 23. Oct 12 Mark Millard Patches from ~gonzo/arm/rpi3-smp/u-boot-patches/ missing from u-boot upstream and 24. Oct 12 Mark Millard Re: Patches from ~gonzo/arm/rpi3-smp/u-boot-patches/ missing from u-boot upstream 25. Oct 15 KIRIYAMA Kazuhiko Re: RockPro64 booting w/ u-boot v2019-rc3 26. Oct 12 Mark Millard RPi4B: an example of what dtdebug=1 in config.txt shows 27. Oct 12 Mark Millard RPi4B: an example of what RAM u-boot reserves during operation (not necessarily ma 28. Oct 13 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: an example of what RAM u-boot reserves during operation [patch included 29. Oct 13 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: an example of what RAM u-boot reserves during operation [patches update 30. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: emmc2bus dma-range handling does not track the boot-time-FDT (u-boot ba 31. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 32. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 33. Oct 11 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 34. Oct 11 Robert Crowston Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 35. Oct 11 Robert Crowston Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 36. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 37. Oct 11 Robert Crowston Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 38. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 39. Oct 11 Mark Murray Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 40. Oct 11 Robert Crowston Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails]
41. Oct 11 Robert Crowston Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 42. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 43. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 44. Oct 11 Robert Crowston Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 45. Oct 11 Kyle Evans Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 46. Oct 11 Robert Crowston Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 47. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 48. Oct 11 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 49. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 50. Oct 11 Robert Crowston Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 51. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 52. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 53. Oct 11 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 54. Oct 11 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 55. Oct 11 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 56. Oct 11 Robert Crowston Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 57. Oct 12 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 58. Oct 12 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 59. Oct 12 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 60. Oct 12 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails]
61. Oct 12 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 62. Oct 12 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 63. Oct 12 Robert Crowston Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 64. Oct 13 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 65. Oct 15 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: RPi4B: modern firmware vs. Device tree loaded to 0x4000 (size 0xbe0c) [fails] 66. Oct 12 Mark Millard RPi4B: u-boot printenv shows: fdt_addr=4000 (input to u-boot) vs. fdt_addr_r=0x026 67. Oct 12 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: u-boot printenv shows: fdt_addr=4000 (input to u-boot) vs. fdt_addr_r=0 68. Oct 12 Mark Millard Re: RPi4B: u-boot printenv shows: fdt_addr=4000 (input to u-boot) vs. fdt_addr_r=0 69. Oct 17 ykla Status of SDIO 70. Oct 17 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: Status of SDIO 71. Oct 17 Klaus Cucinauomo Re: Status of SDIO 72. Oct 16 Jeremy Faulkner weird espressobin behavior


home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date