2024/freebsd-ports/20240212.freebsd-ports
Messages: 53, sorted by subject
|
Last page update: Sat Jan 3 13:13:46 UTC 2026
|
|
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
1. Feb 9 Mark Millard Building graphics/mesa-dri 23.3.5 via devel/llvm18 18.1.0rc2: use of undeclared identifier 'createLoopSinkPass' 2. Feb 7 jonc@chen.org.nz Committer request for PR 3. Feb 6 Mark Millard devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/local/llvm18/lib/clang/18/include/arm_sme.h" more 4. Feb 6 Brooks Davis Re: devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/local/llvm18/lib/clang/18/include/arm_sme.h" more 5. Feb 6 Mark Millard Re: devel/llvm18 on amd64: phase: package "Unable to access file . . ./stage/usr/local/llvm18/lib/clang/18/include/arm_sme.h" more 6. Feb 10 Derek Schrock devel/py-python-gitlab: Update to 4.4.0 bugzilla 276480 7. Feb 6 Mark Millard For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 8. Feb 6 Mark Millard Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 9. Feb 7 Mark Millard Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 10. Feb 7 Brooks Davis Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 11. Feb 7 Mark Millard Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 12. Feb 8 Brooks Davis Re: For devel/llvm18 context: Bad llvm18 *.so file names? Bad references to llvm18 *.so file names? libLLVM-18.so vs. libLLVM-18rc.so ? 13. Feb 8 Mark Millard lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 14. Feb 9 Lorenzo Salvadore Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 15. Feb 9 Gerald Pfeifer Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 16. Feb 9 Mark Millard Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 17. Feb 9 Konstantin Belousov Re: lang/gcc* and MULTILIB: arm64 (aarch64) is never set up, even for main 18. Feb 7 Brooks Davis lang/gcc* broken on current, fix in the works 19. Feb 7 Brooks Davis Re: lang/gcc* broken on current, fix in the works 20. Feb 11 Jamie Landeg-Jones lang/gnatdroid-* deprecate?
21. Feb 11 Moin Rahman Re: lang/gnatdroid-* deprecate? 22. Feb 7 henrichhartzer@tuta.io Re: Latest and quarterly best practices 23. Feb 11 Jamie Landeg-Jones Maintainer timeout request: security/sslscan 24. Feb 7 Mark Millard Mk/Uses/llvm.mk is going to need _LLVM_MK_VALID_VERSIONS to also list 18 25. Feb 11 Xavier Humbert PHP upgrade 8.1 -> 8.2 does not update php.ini 26. Feb 11 Patrick M. Hausen Re: PHP upgrade 8.1 -> 8.2 does not update php.ini 27. Feb 11 Xavier Humbert Re: PHP upgrade 8.1 -> 8.2 does not update php.ini 28. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: port shares same binary and manual names with base ztest (ZFS) 29. Feb 8 Tomoaki AOKI Re: port shares same binary and manual names with base ztest (ZFS) 30. Feb 9 Nuno Teixeira Re: port shares same binary and manual names with base ztest (ZFS) 31. Feb 10 Tomoaki AOKI Re: port shares same binary and manual names with base ztest (ZFS) 32. Feb 5 Yuri Re: problem with Obs-Studio 33. Feb 8 Luca Pizzamiglio Subpackages: Update 34. Feb 9 Tatsuki Makino Re: Subpackages: Update 35. Feb 5 portscout@FreeBSD.org Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date 36. Feb 7 portscout@FreeBSD.org Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date 37. Feb 8 portscout@FreeBSD.org Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date 38. Feb 10 portscout@FreeBSD.org Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date 39. Feb 11 portscout@FreeBSD.org Unmaintained FreeBSD ports which are out of date 40. Feb 8 Tomoaki AOKI Urgent: Committer wanted for Bug 276245 to avoid deletion at 2024-02-10
41. Feb 8 Tomoaki AOKI Re: Urgent: Committer wanted for Bug 276245 to avoid deletion at 2024-02-10 42. Feb 6 Mark Millard Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude FLANG for armv6 ) 43. Feb 6 Brooks Davis Re: Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude FLANG for armv6 ) 44. Feb 6 Mark Millard Re: Why does devel/llvm18 not exclude FLANG for armv6? ( devel/llvm17 does exclude FLANG for armv6 ) 45. Feb 6 Mark Millard Why does Mk/Uses/compiler.mk have code for "# clang not always supported on Tier-2" these days? 46. Feb 6 Brooks Davis Re: Why does Mk/Uses/compiler.mk have code for "# clang not always supported on Tier-2" these days? 47. Feb 8 Mark Millard Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 48. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 49. Feb 8 Dimitry Andric Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 50. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 51. Feb 8 Nuno Teixeira Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 52. Feb 8 Mark Millard Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang 53. Feb 9 Lorenzo Salvadore Re: Why lang/gcc14-devel builds are failing on the build servers: needs USES= compiler:c++14-lang (or higher) instead of compiler:c++11-lang
home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date