2025/freebsd-current/20251215.freebsd-current
Messages: 64, sorted by subject
|
Last update: Mon Dec 15 0:07:05 2025
|
|
home | up | sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date | archive
1. Dec 8 A FreeBSD User Re: 15-STABLE: dhclient fails on em0 (Lenovo T580) 2. Dec 10 Chris Anyone know how to get FreeBSD on a framework 13 laptop? 3. Dec 10 Cy Schubert Re: Anyone know how to get FreeBSD on a framework 13 laptop? 4. Dec 10 vermaden Re: Anyone know how to get FreeBSD on a framework 13 laptop? 5. Dec 10 Chris Re: Anyone know how to get FreeBSD on a framework 13 laptop? 6. Dec 10 Tomoaki AOKI Re: Anyone know how to get FreeBSD on a framework 13 laptop? 7. Dec 10 Tomoaki AOKI Re: Anyone know how to get FreeBSD on a framework 13 laptop? 8. Dec 10 Ed Maste Re: Anyone know how to get FreeBSD on a framework 13 laptop? 9. Dec 10 Chris Re: Anyone know how to get FreeBSD on a framework 13 laptop? 10. Dec 14 Alexander Leidinger Changes in cam/nvme causes issues? 11. Dec 14 Warner Losh Re: Changes in cam/nvme causes issues? 12. Dec 8 Don Lewis CURRENT buildworld broken 13. Dec 8 Don Lewis Re: CURRENT buildworld broken 14. Dec 12 Dennis Clarke does idprio not respect group members in idletime ? 15. Dec 12 Olivier Certner Re: does idprio not respect group members in idletime ? 16. Dec 12 Dennis Clarke Re: does idprio not respect group members in idletime ? 17. Dec 8 Rozhuk Ivan Re: fib selection and persistence using ipfw 18. Dec 8 Michael Butler Re: fib selection and persistence using ipfw 19. Dec 8 Michael Gmelin Re: fib selection and persistence using ipfw 20. Dec 9 Rozhuk Ivan Re: fib selection and persistence using ipfw
21. Dec 9 Graham Percival FreeBSD Git Weekly 2025-12-01 to 2025-12-07 22. Dec 13 Mark Millard git: 1fd0fb4a67f2 - main - misc/compat15x: Add new port [why OPTIONS_EXCLUDE_aarch64=COMPAT32 ? Also: same question for compat14x ] 23. Dec 9 S. Ross Gohlke mddestroy from script hangs 24. Dec 9 =?utf-8?B?0JvQtdC+0L3QuNC0 Re: operation not supported Wayland 25. Dec 9 S. Ross Gohlke Re: operation not supported Wayland 26. Dec 10 =?utf-8?B?0JvQtdC+0L3QuNC0 Re: operation not supported Wayland 27. Dec 10 S. Ross Gohlke Re: operation not supported Wayland 28. Dec 10 S. Ross Gohlke Re: operation not supported Wayland 29. Dec 10 =?utf-8?B?0JvQtdC+0L3QuNC0 Re: operation not supported Wayland 30. Dec 8 Konstantin Belousov Re: performance regressions in 15.0 31. Dec 8 Rozhuk Ivan Re: performance regressions in 15.0 32. Dec 8 Konstantin Belousov Re: performance regressions in 15.0 33. Dec 8 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3 Re: performance regressions in 15.0 34. Dec 8 Rozhuk Ivan Re: performance regressions in 15.0 35. Dec 8 Rozhuk Ivan Re: performance regressions in 15.0 36. Dec 8 Rozhuk Ivan Re: performance regressions in 15.0 37. Dec 8 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: performance regressions in 15.0 38. Dec 8 Konstantin Belousov Re: performance regressions in 15.0 39. Dec 8 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: performance regressions in 15.0 40. Dec 8 Marek Zarychta Re: performance regressions in 15.0
41. Dec 8 Rozhuk Ivan Re: performance regressions in 15.0 42. Dec 8 Mateusz Guzik Re: performance regressions in 15.0 43. Dec 8 Rozhuk Ivan Re: performance regressions in 15.0 44. Dec 10 Mark Millard Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [14.3-STABLE performs much like 15.0-RELEASE for my aarch64 devel/cmake-core build tests, not like 14.3-RE 45. Dec 10 Mark Millard Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [Similar port-package build time-ratios reproduce on Microsoft Dev Kit 2023] 46. Dec 11 Mark Millard Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [Single example of amd64 7950X3CD system's build-time ratio for 14.3-STABLE / 14.3-RELEASE (jails)] 47. Dec 8 Mateusz Guzik Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [The Microsoft Dev Kit 2023 buildworld took about 6 minutes less time for jemalloc 5.3.0, not more, for no 48. Dec 8 Poul-Henning Kamp Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [The Microsoft Dev Kit 2023 buildworld took about 6 minutes less time for jemalloc 5.3.0, not more, for no 49. Dec 8 Mark Millard Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [The Microsoft Dev Kit 2023 buildworld took about 6 minutes less time for jemalloc 5.3.0, not more, for no 50. Dec 9 Rozhuk Ivan Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [The Microsoft Dev Kit 2023 buildworld took about 6 minutes less time for jemalloc 5.3.0, not more, for no 51. Dec 9 Mark Millard Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [The Microsoft Dev Kit 2023 buildworld took about 6 minutes less time for jemalloc 5.3.0, not more, for no 52. Dec 8 Mark Millard Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [What should be the case for 15.0-RELEASE: WITH_ASSEERT_DEBUG or WITHOUT_ASSERT_DEBUG ?] 53. Dec 9 Mark Millard Re: performance regressions in 15.0 [What should be the case for 15.0-RELEASE: WITH_ASSEERT_DEBUG or WITHOUT_ASSERT_DEBUG ?] 54. Dec 8 Chris What happened to 16? 55. Dec 8 Thomas Schweikle Re: What happened to 16? 56. Dec 8 Chris Re: What happened to 16? 57. Dec 8 Thomas Schweikle Re: What happened to 16? 58. Dec 8 Alexander Motin Re: What happened to 16? 59. Dec 8 Chris Re: What happened to 16? 60. Dec 8 Philip Paeps Re: What happened to 16?
61. Dec 8 S. Ross Gohlke Re: What happened to 16? 62. Dec 8 Chris Re: What happened to 16? 63. Dec 8 S. Ross Gohlke Re: What happened to 16? 64. Dec 9 Chris Re: What happened to 16?
home | up | sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date | archive