Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2025/freebsd-hackers/20250203.freebsd-hackers

Messages: 44, sorted by subject
Last page update: Sat Jan 3 13:10:36 UTC 2026

home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date
  1. Feb  1 Bjoern A. Zeeb             %b with uint64_t?
  2. Feb  1 Konstantin Belousov         Re: %b with uint64_t?
  3. Feb  2 Steve Kargl                bhyve an missing packages?
  4. Feb  2 Miroslav Lachman            Re: bhyve an missing packages?
  5. Feb  2 Olivier Cochard-Labbé       Re: bhyve an missing packages?
  6. Feb  2 Olivier Cochard-Labbé       Re: bhyve an missing packages?
  7. Feb  2 Steve Kargl                 Re: bhyve an missing packages?
  8. Feb  2 Miroslav Lachman            Re: bhyve an missing packages?
  9. Jan 27 Konstantin Belousov        Re: gcc14 static linking ends with segfault
 10. Jan 27 Steve Kargl                 Re: gcc14 static linking ends with segfault
 11. Jan 27 Dimitry Andric              Re: gcc14 static linking ends with segfault
 12. Jan 27 Steve Kargl                 Re: gcc14 static linking ends with segfault
 13. Jan 27 Steve Kargl                 Re: gcc14 static linking ends with segfault
 14. Jan 27 Dimitry Andric              Re: gcc14 static linking ends with segfault
 15. Jan 27 Konstantin Belousov         Re: gcc14 static linking ends with segfault
 16. Jan 27 Steve Kargl                 Re: gcc14 static linking ends with segfault
 17. Jan 27 Dimitry Andric              Re: gcc14 static linking ends with segfault
 18. Jan 27 Konstantin Belousov         Re: gcc14 static linking ends with segfault
 19. Jan 28 Manas Ghandat              Re: GSoC project Ideas
 20. Jan 28 Manas Ghandat               Re: GSoC project Ideas

 21. Jan 28 Lorenzo Salvadore           Re: GSoC project Ideas
 22. Jan 28 Lorenzo Salvadore           Re: GSoC project Ideas
 23. Feb  1 Sulev-Madis Silber         Re: Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 24. Jan 30 paige@paige.bio             Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 25. Jan 30 Ярослав Машко               Re: Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 26. Jan 30 David Chisnall              Re: Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 27. Jan 30 Sulev-Madis Silber          Re: Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 28. Jan 31 paige@paige.bio             Re: Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 29. Jan 31 David Chisnall              Re: Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 30. Jan 31 David Chisnall              Re: Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 31. Jan 31 paige@paige.bio             Re: Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 32. Jan 31 paige@paige.bio             Re: Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 33. Jan 31 Sulev-Madis Silber          Re: Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 34. Jan 31 Alexander Leidinger         Re: Provisions to the contribution guidelines for using LLM generated code
 35. Jan 28 Tomek CEDRO                Re: Suggestions for Ryzen 9 motherboards
 36. Jan 28 Daniel Engberg              Re: Suggestions for Ryzen 9 motherboards
 37. Jan 28 Tomek CEDRO                 Re: Suggestions for Ryzen 9 motherboards
 38. Jan 28 Mohammad Noureldin          Re: Suggestions for Ryzen 9 motherboards
 39. Jan 28 Paul Floyd                  Re: Suggestions for Ryzen 9 motherboards
 40. Jan 28 Paul Floyd                  Re: Suggestions for Ryzen 9 motherboards

 41. Feb  2 Mohammad Noureldin         Re: Thunderbolt3/USB4 targeting: should the wiki materials be more explicit about Thunderbolt 3 vs. Thunderbolt 4 distinctions?
 42. Feb  2 Mark Millard                Re: Thunderbolt3/USB4 targeting: should the wiki materials be more explicit about Thunderbolt 3 vs. Thunderbolt 4 distinctions?
 43. Jan 30 Mohammad Noureldin          Re: Thunderbolt3/USB4 targeting: should the wiki materials be more explicit about Thunderbolt 3 vs. Thunderbolt 4 distinctions?
 44. Jan 30 Mark Millard                Re: Thunderbolt3/USB4 targeting: should the wiki materials be more explicit about Thunderbolt 3 vs. Thunderbolt 4 distinctions?

home | up | archive | sorted by: subject - author - date - reverse date