Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)


2025/freebsd-hackers/20250811.freebsd-hackers

Messages: 64, sorted by subject
Last update: Mon Aug 11 0:07:33 2025

home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date
  1. Aug  8 Kyle Evans                 [HEADSUP] ucred / group changes in FreeBSD 15.0
  2. Aug  8 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3  Re: [HEADSUP] ucred / group changes in FreeBSD 15.0
  3. Aug  8 Kyle Evans                  Re: [HEADSUP] ucred / group changes in FreeBSD 15.0
  4. Aug  8 =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3  Re: [HEADSUP] ucred / group changes in FreeBSD 15.0
  5. Aug  6 Anthony Pankov             does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
  6. Aug  8 Vadim Goncharov             Re: does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
  7. Aug  8 Kyle Evans                  Re: does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
  8. Aug  9 Anthony Pankov              Re: does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
  9. Aug  9 Anthony Pankov              Re: does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
 10. Aug  9 Kyle Evans                  Re: does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
 11. Aug  9 Anthony Pankov              Re: does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
 12. Aug  9 =?UTF-8?Q?Jes=C3=BAs_Danie  Re: does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
 13. Aug  9 Kyle Evans                  Re: does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
 14. Aug  9 Vadim Goncharov             Re: does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
 15. Aug  9 Vadim Goncharov             Re: does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
 16. Aug 10 James Gritton               Re: does numeric only name of jails not allowed (bug?)
 17. Aug  5 =?UTF-8?Q?Aur=C3=A9lien_Co Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR) via O_NAMEDATTR / Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR)?
 18. Aug  5 Rick Macklem                Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR) via O_NAMEDATTR / Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR)?
 19. Aug  5 Cedric Blancher             Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR) via O_NAMEDATTR / Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR)?
 20. Aug  5 Rick Macklem                Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR) via O_NAMEDATTR / Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR)?


21. Aug 7 Rick Macklem Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR) via O_NAMEDATTR / Re: FreeBSD NFSv4.1 nfsd, named attribute support (OPENATTR)? 22. Aug 7 Jaeyoon Choi How can I measure code coverage for a device driver? 23. Aug 7 Warner Losh Re: How can I measure code coverage for a device driver? 24. Aug 2 David Chisnall Re: Non-root chroot 25. Aug 4 Daniel O'Connor Re: Non-root chroot 26. Aug 4 Vadim Goncharov Re: Non-root chroot 27. Aug 4 Jason Bacon Re: Non-root chroot 28. Aug 4 Vadim Goncharov Re: Non-root chroot 29. Aug 5 Daniel O'Connor Re: Non-root chroot 30. Aug 5 Joe Schaefer Re: Non-root chroot 31. Aug 5 David Chisnall Re: Non-root chroot 32. Aug 5 Charlie Li Re: Non-root chroot 33. Aug 5 Jason Bacon Re: Non-root chroot 34. Aug 6 Jamie Landeg-Jones Re: Non-root chroot 35. Aug 6 Jason Bacon Re: Non-root chroot 36. Aug 8 Jamie Landeg-Jones Re: Non-root chroot 37. Aug 9 Jason Bacon Re: Non-root chroot 38. Aug 9 Jamie Landeg-Jones Re: Non-root chroot 39. Aug 5 Roman Bogorodskiy posix_fallocate(2) performance 40. Aug 5 Rick Macklem Re: posix_fallocate(2) performance
41. Aug 5 Ed Maste Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 42. Aug 5 Isaac (.ike) Levy Re: Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 43. Aug 5 Jordan Gordeev Re: Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 44. Aug 5 Tomek CEDRO Re: Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 45. Aug 5 Ed Maste Re: Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 46. Aug 5 Shawn Webb Re: Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 47. Aug 5 Bjoern A. Zeeb Re: Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 48. Aug 5 Ed Maste Re: Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 49. Aug 5 Jason Bacon Re: Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 50. Aug 6 Darren Henderson Re: Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 51. Aug 6 Jason Bacon Re: Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 52. Aug 7 Gleb Popov Re: Proposal: Enabling unprivileged chroot by default 53. Aug 7 David Cross removing certain umass (cd/dvd?) devices appears to lock up the USB bus on 14.2/14.3 (at least) 54. Aug 7 Warner Losh Re: removing certain umass (cd/dvd?) devices appears to lock up the USB bus on 14.2/14.3 (at least) 55. Aug 6 Ed Maste RFC: Adopting OSV for Vulnerability Database 56. Aug 6 Tomek CEDRO Re: RFC: Adopting OSV for Vulnerability Database 57. Aug 6 Steffen Nurpmeso Re: RFC: Adopting OSV for Vulnerability Database 58. Aug 6 Ed Maste RFC: Adopting SPDX for SBOM generation 59. Aug 6 Lexi Winter Re: RFC: Adopting SPDX for SBOM generation 60. Aug 6 Warner Losh Re: RFC: Adopting SPDX for SBOM generation
61. Aug 6 Tomek CEDRO Re: RFC: Adopting SPDX for SBOM generation 62. Aug 7 Rob Norris Re: RFC: Adopting SPDX for SBOM generation 63. Aug 8 Warner Losh Re: RFC: Adopting SPDX for SBOM generation 64. Aug 8 Rob Norris Re: RFC: Adopting SPDX for SBOM generation


home | up | archive sorted by: subject | author | date | reverse date